Impeachment Against Madras High Court Judge G. R. Swaminathan

Impeachment Against Madras High Court Judge G. R. Swaminathan || Not an Attack on the Judiciary, but on Sanatan Dharma || Are Indian Politicians Slaves of a communal fundamentalist  ?

                                   

If it is said abroad that Hindus are in danger in India, that Hinduism itself is under threat, many may dismiss it as an exaggeration or even a joke. However, every conscious Hindu living in India knows well that today he is not treated as a second-class citizen, but rather as a seventh or eighth-class one—against whom anyone, anywhere, at any time, can do anything.

On the hill of Thirupparankundram in Madurai district of Tamil Nadu, the tradition of lighting the sacred lamp has existed for centuries. This time, however, the local administration stopped it. On a petition filed by Hindus, the High Court granted permission to light the lamp on the ancient stone pillar under the tradition of “Karthigai Deepam.” Enraged by this, anti-Sanatan elements appeared to lose their mental balance and opened a front against the judge. The reason is obvious—how could a judge possibly deliver a verdict in favor of Hindus at the cost of vote-bank politics?

Blatantly disregarding the Constitution, the Tamil Nadu government failed to comply with the court’s order. Even after the High Court directed that the lamp be lit under the protection of central security forces, the local administration imposed Section 144 in the area and prevented devotees from entering the temple premise. In its report, the Central Industrial Security Force stated that the Madurai Police Commissioner, along with more than 200 police personnel, obstructed their unit from implementing the court’s order. The state government ensured, at any cost, that the tradition of lamp-lighting was not completed.

Not only the DMK government, but leaders of every opposition party—big and small—have been spewing venom against the judge who delivered the verdict, Justice G. R. Swaminathan. This amounts to intimidating the judiciary and issuing a warning for the future. Such an instance of contempt is extremely rare in India’s judicial history. The state government has committed a grave constitutional violation, and such a government ought to have been dismissed immediately by the President. However, keeping the upcoming Tamil Nadu Assembly elections in mind, the BJP-led central government is unlikely to take such a political risk.

Meanwhile, the ruling DMK in Tamil Nadu, along with the Congress, Samajwadi Party, TMC, Shiv Sena (Uddhav faction), Nationalist Congress Party (Sharad Pawar), AIMIM, Indian Union Muslim League, and other opposition parties, submitted an impeachment motion bearing the signatures of 120 Members of Parliament against Justice G. R. Swaminathan to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Leaders such as Priyanka Vadra, Akhilesh Yadav, T. R. Baalu, Kanimozhi, and others were present at the time of submission.

Although this motion is unlikely to proceed further due to the BJP’s majority in both houses of Parliament, had the Congress been in power at this time, not only would the impeachment have been passed, but a clear message would also have been sent—that those who respect Hindu faith would not be spared.

What thousands of attacks by fanatical Islamic invaders and centuries of foreign rule could not accomplish, India’s own politics is attempting to do today. The dream of turning India into an Islamic nation through “Ghazwa-e-Hind,” envisioned by extremists, is now being actively pursued by selfish politicians—solely for Muslim votes, through which they can attain power and enjoy royal privileges. Tragically, many among them are Hindus themselves, who have no respect for their ancestors, culture, or civilization. It is difficult to imagine such a profound moral decline in any civilized society.

Even before the controversies surrounding the announcements of Babri Mosque construction and government-backed foundation-laying ceremonies in Murshidabad (West Bengal) and Hyderabad (Telangana) had cooled down, the DMK government of Tamil Nadu, determined not to lag behind in Muslim appeasement, chose to confront the judiciary itself. As a result, Justice Swaminathan’s name came into the limelight in the temple–dargah dispute. At present, opposition parties are competing with one another to prove who is the greatest benefactor of Muslims. The Congress has even openly declared: “Congress means Muslims, and Muslims mean Congress.” It is easy to understand where Indian politics is heading.

As far as the dispute itself is concerned, Thirupparankundram is one of the six major abodes of Lord Murugan (Kartikeya). During the Tamil month of Karthigai, the tradition of lighting a lamp on the hill is extremely ancient. Near the same hill stands a dargah, due to which the matter was made sensitive. Although the Muslim community has no objection to the lamp being lit, the state government seems to be telling them, “You may not know it, but you do have a problem.”

It is tragic and unfortunate that in today’s India, Hindus require judicial intervention to practice their faith and rituals—and even after a judicial verdict, they cannot peacefully perform worship of their deity on their own land. What kind of Constitution is this, which fails to protect the country’s original culture and religion? Due to obstinate anti-Hindu attitudes, the date for lamp-lighting has already passed.

Can any other religious community be told:

“Observe Roza next month, take out the Muharram procession a week later, or celebrate Christmas in January?”

But Hindus can be told:

You will not get permission for Durga pandals; you cannot immerse idols on Fridays; you cannot burst crackers on Diwali; you cannot play with colors on Holi; you cannot play DJs during the Kanwar Yatra; you cannot take out Ram Navami processions; you cannot use loudspeakers during Ganesh festivals; you cannot stop non-Hindus from entering Dandiya pandals; you cannot take wedding processions past mosques; and you cannot raise your voice against love jihad, spitting jihad, or land jihad.

The executive, the judiciary, NGOs, civil society, secularists, reformists, leftists, extremists, so-called moderates, intellectual groups, and both central and state governments—everyone’s target is always the Hindu. But why?

As for Justice Swaminathan, at first glance there is no indication of any particular bias. He has delivered judgments against the BJP’s Tamil Nadu president Annamalai in hate-speech cases. Several of his decisions have gone in favor of the Muslim community as well. He is known for his clear observations and swift judgments. Recently, he released his performance data, which showed that he disposed of nearly 65,000 cases in seven years—an achievement in itself. This is an outstanding example of judicial responsibility.

In reality, this impeachment is not an attack on a judge, but a direct assault on Sanatan Dharma. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin and his family have long been working against Sanatan traditions. Stalin himself once described Sanatan Dharma as “dengue and malaria” and vowed to eradicate it from its roots.

It is heartening that many retired judges, lawyers, and members of the intellectual community have come forward in support of Justice G. R. Swaminathan. Otherwise, the manner in which the opposition is attacking constitutional institutions for its own interests would have placed India’s democratic system in grave danger.

The need of the hour is for all followers of Sanatan Dharma to rise above caste and language and establish unity among themselves. Otherwise, even while being a majority, they will be responsible for their own persecution. A community that cannot protect its religion and culture cannot expect anyone else to protect it—and no one ever will.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Message of the Dharma–Flag at the Ram Temple -Is Modi Truly Like This, or Does He Only Appear So?

 

---

The Message of the Dharma–Flag at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya || Is Modi Truly Like This, or Does He Only Appear So? || Why Does the Opposition Not Stand With the Nation?

The historic day of 25 November 2025 became immensely significant — not just for India, not only for Hindus — but for the entire world and for all humanity, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi hoisted the saffron Dharma–Flag atop the spire of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya and declared:

“The wait of 500 years has finally ended; the sacred offering is now complete — a yajna that never faltered in faith, never diminished in belief.”

After centuries of waiting, struggle, trust, and rays of hope, the moment when the Dharma–Flag fluttered atop the Ram Temple was no longer merely a religious ritual; it became the dawn of India’s civilizational resurgence — a moment whose divine resonance touched the entire world.

The hoisting of the Dharma–Flag holds deep symbolic and inspirational meaning for Sanatan Dharma — affirming its continuity, reinforcing sacred family values, and reminding future generations of the eternal ideals of righteous living. As the Mahabharata proclaims:

“Na dharmo hi aṁśubhiḥ sādhyaḥ”

— The light of Dharma illuminates its own path.

This event is extraordinary not because it is a religious ritual, but because it marks the proclamation of a new national paradigm — one that can be clearly defined as:

“Ram is the soul of the nation, and only through the awakening of the soul can the nation rise.”

A line from the Manusmriti resounds today with renewed meaning, and every Hindu must internalize it:

“Dharmo rakṣati rakṣitaḥ”

— Dharma protects those who protect it.

Thus, the hoisting of the Dharma–Flag at the Ram Temple is not merely a religious act; it is a historic moment intertwined with India’s collective consciousness, civilizational journey, and present national discourse. For the first time since independence, the world witnessed India re-establish its Sanatan cultural identity at the center of national consciousness — when the entire nation became Ram–may.

“The name of Ram is not a slogan; it is the life–force of the nation.”

Therefore, this flag-hoisting is not merely the ascent of a flag atop a temple, but a civilizational shift.

In truth, it redefines India’s real secularism. For decades, distancing oneself from Hindu culture and Sanatan identity was considered a badge of secularism. When independent India needed cultural restoration, Nehru played divisive politics over the reconstruction of the Somnath Temple and even barred President Dr. Rajendra Prasad from attending its inauguration. The underlying message was that the ruins left behind by Islamic invaders must remain untouched. It revealed their indifference toward the world’s oldest living civilization and a lack of responsibility toward the Hindu majority.

Yet, ironically, from Nehru and Indira to Rahul — almost every member of the Gandhi family has paid homage at Babur’s tomb in Afghanistan.

Prime Minister Modi personally hoisting the Dharma–Flag marks a profound shift — India has now entered an era where civilizational memory is no longer confined to history but has become the driving force of nation-building. The flag fluttering atop the Ram Temple declares that India is placing its ancient, glorious heritage at the very center of its modern national identity.

The Mahabharata repeatedly affirms:

“Yato dharmas tato jayaḥ.”

— Where there is Dharma, there is victory.

This is precisely what India is announcing to the world today.

PM Modi connected faith with nation-building and public welfare, describing this historic moment as an inspiration for a broader, inclusive, and welfare-oriented vision — one that is timely, necessary, and transformative.

The Congress and much of the opposition boycotting the ceremony was based purely on Muslim appeasement politics — the same old vote-bank arithmetic. But due to rising Hindu awareness and unity, this politics is no longer as effective. It is undeniable that the Ram Temple and Ayodhya have become the epicenter of modern Indian politics, and this flag-hoisting has cemented that status.

This ceremony displayed a remarkable confluence of faith and state power, indicating that in the coming years, India's trajectory will be determined not only by economic progress but also by cultural discourse. This cultural reawakening will strengthen India’s pluralistic structure while enabling India to present its identity on the global stage with clarity and pride.

Internationally, this step gives new direction to the expansion of India’s soft power. Yoga, Ayurveda, and Indian philosophy have already shaped India’s global image. Now, the Ram Temple and its symbols will add a new dimension. Cultural symbolism is powerful in geopolitics. The scene in Ayodhya sent a clear message to many nations — India is advancing toward modernity without severing its roots.

The Dharma–Flag at Ayodhya is not only a national festival of faith but also a symbol of the global Ramayana tradition and cultural diplomacy. It strengthens India’s bonds with countries where Ram and the Ramayana are still part of living culture.

• In Indonesia, Ramayana is celebrated widely.

• In Thailand, the Ramakien is the national epic.

• In Cambodia, the royal dance–drama Reamker is famous.

• Janakpur in Nepal is revered as Sita’s birthplace.

• In Laos and Myanmar, local Ramayana traditions shape folk culture.

Thus, the Ram Temple will also become a major engine of tourism and economic growth. Millions of devotees and tourists will visit annually, giving a long-term boost to religious tourism.

The Ram Temple has expanded cultural nationalism, and its role will only deepen in India’s future politics. This will strengthen national unity, integrity, and security. It is in the nation’s interest that Sanatan symbols and cultural events become central to political discourse — helping end the politics of communal appeasement. If the ideals of Ram Rajya can be integrated with modern governance, politics, faith, and development can progress together.

I am glad that — at least outwardly — Prime Minister Modi is signaling a shift toward Hindutva-oriented politics. It is difficult to say whether he no longer cares about electoral compulsions or whether he is under political pressure. But his repeated emphasis on “500 years” — the same phrase he used during Advani’s Rath Yatra days — clearly indicates that he wants to reaffirm that Hindus have never been as important as they are today, and that Hindus hold special significance for him.

But questions remain:

• Then why are Hindu temples still not freed from government control?

• Why no freedom for Hindus to operate Gurukuls independently?

• Why no effective action against Gazwa-e-Hind conspiracies?

• Why no Uniform Civil Code or a strong national anti-conversion law?

The Hindu community often feels satisfied merely by witnessing Modi’s Hindu-friendly statements or public worship rituals — because before him, no Prime Minister even dared to do that in India’s politically hostile, Hindu-averse environment. Even this is a major step — but it is like watering the leaves of a tree instead of its roots.

For too long, symbolism alone cannot satisfy a community or safeguard a civilization. Modi and the BJP must understand this — and so must we. The Congress and other political parties never will.

~~~~~~~~~~shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ganga-Jamuni Culture, Brotherhood, and the Noise of Peace

 

---

Ganga-Jamuni Culture, Brotherhood, and the Noise of Peace || How Prepared Are You to Live in an Islamic Nation? || The Global Impact of Political Islam

---

For years, I have been warning through my writings about the growing threat of Islamization in India under the conspiracies of Ghazwa-e-Hind. Documents recovered in Phulwari Sharif, Bihar revealed that the Popular Front of India (PFI) was working on a plan to turn India into an Islamic nation by 2047. I did not expect this danger to surface so quickly and in such a massive form. The recent bombing near Delhi’s Red Fort exposed the involvement of jihadist doctors linked to Al-Falah University near Faridabad. This university was being used to prepare “white-collar terror modules.” The involvement of female doctors is also a major concern. Two such women, educated in Bangladesh and allegedly connected to terrorist organizations in Turkey and other Islamic countries, have been arrested.

The facts emerging from the Delhi blast are deeply worrying and shocking. It was a suicide bombing carried out by Dr. Umar Nabi, a specialist doctor and professor at Al-Falah University, who turned himself into a human bomb. Until now, security agencies believed suicide bombings were unlikely in India, since Indian Islam and Indian Muslims were considered distinct from others worldwide. Suicide bombing is an ISIS strategy, waging war against humanity in many countries. To kill “infidels” or damage a nation by becoming a human bomb is the extreme peak of Islamic radicalism. Once such a situation arises in a country, it becomes very difficult to control. Its beginning in India is a matter of grave concern.

The long-celebrated talk of Ganga-Jamuni Tehzeeb, brotherhood, and peace is, in reality, a deception — a shield to hide conspiratorial efforts of Islamization. Several people linked to the university were members of white-collar terror modules, systematically planning terrorist activities. The arrested doctors were working under Pakistan-backed handlers. The university was used as a safe haven. A fraud of ₹415 crore was also uncovered, where university funds were misused to build terror modules. These modules were found to have links with Kashmir as well.

Amid raids and arrests in the Valley, the political face of Islam also came forward. Mehbooba Mufti said the blast was the result of a “pressure-cooker atmosphere” created in the country, blaming central government policies. She claimed Kashmir’s troubles had spoken out at the Red Fort, pointing to rising Islamophobia and persecution of Muslims nationwide. Such statements appear to indirectly support terrorist activities. Her daughter, Iltija Mufti, expressed concern over Dr. Umar Nabi’s suicide bombing, linking the incident to Islamophobia and questioning security forces. Omar Abdullah, former J&K Chief Minister, said some individuals were responsible for the blast, but the perception was being created that all Kashmiris were guilty. His father, Farooq Abdullah, added that terrorists involved in the Red Fort attack did not represent Kashmiris, urging protection for innocent Kashmiris across India.

Such direct and indirect statements spread the narrative of victimhood and oppression, which is the hallmark of political Islam. Globally, this strategy has been executed with great success, and it has now become Islam’s expertise.

There is no doubt that attempts are being made to turn India into an Islamic nation as quickly as possible, with support from most Muslim groups. Ghazwa-e-Hind is presented as a religious war, aiming to transform India into Dar-ul-Islam (an Islamic nation). Institutions like Darul Uloom Deoband appear to legitimize this idea. Networks like white-collar terror modules, where highly educated individuals are involved in terrorism, highlight the seriousness of this conspiracy.

Mahmood Madani’s campaign to train one crore Muslim youth in physical defense and weapons by 2030 is equally suspicious. Since 2019, nearly 70 lakh youth have already been trained. This resembles the earlier camps run by PFI. Such training cannot be dismissed as innocent, and its role in preparing for civil war under Ghazwa-e-Hind cannot be ignored.

Efforts to Islamize India began with invasions in the 7th century, but India’s vast geography, linguistic diversity, and cultural richness prevented success. Yet, the same conditions that led to India’s partition are being recreated today. Many political parties, driven by vote-bank politics, indulge in Muslim appeasement, directly or indirectly supporting Islamization. Terrorist incidents, conversions, illegal infiltration, population explosion, communal riots, and land grabs through Waqf Boards all appear to serve one purpose — fulfilling the agenda of Ghazwa-e-Hind.

The Constitution itself contains provisions that indirectly support this transformation. Articles 25–26 grant minorities religious freedom and autonomy to run institutions, while Hindus remain disadvantaged. Muslim Personal Law Boards push Sharia practices, madrasas sow seeds of radicalism, and Waqf Boards continue land acquisition. Articles 29–30 give minorities special rights to preserve cultural identity and establish educational institutions, under which madrasas flourish, fostering separatist mindsets. The majority community feels deprived of such privileges.

India has more Muslim religious organizations than anywhere else in the world, many working toward Islamization. Wahhabi and Salafi groups, restricted abroad, operate freely in India. In some countries, mosques open only during prayer times, but in India they remain open continuously, spreading religious fervor. Friday sermons abroad are regulated, requiring certification, while madrasas are banned in many places — yet flourish here unchecked.

Thus, under the guise of minority rights and cultural identity, radical activities in India have become uncontrolled. The result is that the threat of Islamization has grown sharper. If urgent and appropriate steps are not taken, India may face suicide bombings and civil war. The road ahead will only become more difficult.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Delhi Terrorist Blast: Implications and Concerns

 

---

Delhi Terrorist Blast: Implications and Concerns | How Long India can avoid Isl@mization | Terrorism has Religion - which you know.

---

On November 10, 2025, a day preceding the Bihar Assembly elections, an explosion at Delhi's iconic Red Fort sent shockwaves across the nation. This unprecedented act of terrorism was the first in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's eleven-year tenure and struck at a site emblematic of India's sovereignty—the location where the national flag is hoisted annually on Independence Day. The attack resulted in the deaths of thirteen individuals and left over twenty critically injured.

Historically, terrorism in India had been largely confined to regions such as Kashmir, making this occurrence in the national capital an alarming escalation. Prompt investigations by security agencies unveiled disturbing revelations.

A matter of urgent concern is the potential deceleration of the investigation following the BJP alliance’s overwhelming victory in Bihar. Police had intercepted over three quintals of explosives just before the blast—quantities sufficient to inflict mass casualties exceeding one million. The instigators’ objective was reportedly a large-scale massacre targeting the Hindu population. The pressing question remains: what provoked such animosity toward Hindus? It is imperative for every Indian citizen to contemplate the motives behind this abhorrent intent.

The most disturbing revelation is that many accused terrorists were medical professionals—doctors sworn to save lives. The chief suspect, Dr. Umar Mohammad from Pulwama, held an MD in Internal Medicine and was a medical college professor. His expertise in Vehicle-Borne Improvised Explosive Devices (VBIED) was exploited in executing the attack. Another prominent accused, Dr. Shaheen Sayed from Lucknow, operated the female recruitment wing of Jaish-e-Mohammed and was employed at Al-Falah Medical College. Weapons and financial links uncovered in her possession underscore the depth of the conspiracy. Additional apprehended doctors affiliated with Al-Falah Medical University include Dr. Umar Un Navi, Dr. Muzammil Ganai, and Dr. Adil Ahmed Rather. Dr. Ahmed Moinuddin Sayed of Hyderabad was arrested for synthesizing the lethal chemical “Ricin,” allegedly intended for mass Hindu extermination.

This network has been characterized by law enforcement as “white-collar terror,” facilitating terrorism through sophisticated financial, recruitment, armament, and organizational apparatus tied to Jaish-e-Mohammed and Ansar Ghazwat-ul-Hind.

Ethical Quagmire in Medicine

The medical profession's cardinal duty is to preserve life, yet the subversion of this vocation by individuals camouflaging terrorism within medical uniforms amounts to not only a profound ethical crisis but also threatens the credibility of healthcare institutions.

This betrayal of trust propagates societal distrust. Hesitancy among Hindus to consult Muslim doctors cannot be simplistically dismissed as prejudice; it reflects a defensive vigilance born of palpable security concerns. Such social fissures evoke deeply rooted anxieties demanding collective introspection.

Historical Legacy and Contemporary Threats

India's encounter with Islamic invasions since the 7th century inflicted traumatic cultural ruptures, including the massacre of over 100 million Hindus and destruction of temples, replaced by mosques. The vestiges of such atrocities endure, exacerbated by legislative impediments such as the Places of Worship Act, which effectively obstruct Hindu recourse to justice. Neither the previous Congress-led government nor the incumbent BJP administration has remedied these historical injustices.

The doctrine of Ghazwa-e-Hind, aimed at rendering India an Islamic state, remains active within radical Isl@mist circles, regrettably enjoying varying degrees of tacit or overt support among large M@slim demographics. Demographic growth, religious conversions, and illegal immigration are orchestrated components advancing this agenda, shielded by the political machinations of Isl@mist entities.

It is an open secret that while some Indian M@slims oppose extremism and terror, no prominent voice decisively condemns Ghazwa-e-Hind, a silence fraught with implications.

Political Analysis

While the Modi government has enacted landmark policies such as abrogation of Article 370 and the Ram Temple construction, it has fallen short of vital reforms required for Hindu Temple autonomy, Hindu education, and cultural renaissance.

The continuance of state control over Hindu temples, the diversion of offerings for non-Hindu uses, and the unresolved restoration of religious sites seized by invaders remain pressing issues.

Globally, nations that secured independence vigorously restored their cultural and religious heritage; India, however, saw obstruction from Congress post-independence and reluctance from BJP thereafter. Yet, Hindus largely continue to support BJP, constrained by an apprehension that alternative administrations may accelerate the realization of an Isl@mic India by 2047. Modi’s vision of a developed India by 2047 risks ensnaring Hindus in illusions of progress while undermining their identity and security—a predicament that could precipitate a national crisis.

Conclusion

The Red Fort blast and similar incidents transcend mere security matters; they represent grave social and cultural warnings. India's development must not be confined to economic metrics but must equally encompass cultural preservation and national identity.

A society that forfeits its identity and safeguards imperils the very essence of the nation’s existence.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

“Hydrogen Bomb” and Congress’s Difficult Road 

By Shiv Mishra

In recent months, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has continuously launched a barrage of accusations against the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). He has described his revelations as “political bombs”—sometimes calling them “atom bombs,” at other times “hydrogen bombs.” Yet these statements appear less beneficial to Congress and more self-destructive.

Unconcerned about the consequences, Gandhi has been doing things unbecoming of a national-level leader, especially one holding the position of Leader of the Opposition. Ignoring important national occasions, he frequently travels abroad without clear reason, and there he criticizes India unnecessarily in ways that run counter to national interest. This has already cast serious doubt on his role. Other Congress leaders warn that India could face situations similar to Nepal, Bangladesh, or Sri Lanka. Gandhi himself, in his rallies, often delivers inflammatory speeches that deepen caste and communal divisions and incite the youth. Recently, he targeted the judiciary, claiming that “10 percent of upper-caste elites” control it.

Meanwhile, questions linger about his alleged British citizenship, his marital status, and corruption cases such as the Associated Journals property dispute. He has already been sentenced to two years in a defamation case, and several other matters remain pending in courts across the country. It is natural for the nation to wonder whether his connections extend to anti-India organizations or foreign powers.

Allegations on the Haryana Assembly Elections

Just 24 hours before the Bihar Assembly elections, Gandhi leveled serious charges regarding the 2024 Haryana Assembly polls. He claimed that nearly 2.5 million fake votes had been cast, turning Congress’s victory into BJP’s win. He also raised grave doubts about the impartiality of the Election Commission.

However, the actual figures tell another story. BJP received 5.55 million votes (39.94%), while Congress secured 5.43 million (39.09%). The difference was only 118,000 votes, giving BJP 48 seats and Congress 37. This arithmetic is not unusual. Sometimes a party wins a few seats by huge margins, which raises its overall vote share but does not translate into more seats. Conversely, if votes are evenly distributed across constituencies, a party can win more seats even with a narrow margin. That is what happened in Haryana, where BJP managed to win more seats despite the small difference in votes.

India’s electoral system is based on first-past-the-post, where the candidate with the highest votes in each constituency wins. Victory depends on seats, not overall vote percentage.

The Complexity of Seat Arithmetic

In Haryana’s 2024 elections, Congress won Firozpur Jhirka by 98,441 votes, while Punhana and Loharu were won by margins of only 700–800 votes. Out of 90 seats, 31 were decided by margins of less than 1,000 votes—12 for BJP, 10 for Congress, and 9 for other parties. This shows how election results often hinge on very small differences, making Gandhi’s sweeping claims difficult to accept.

Rajiv Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi

In 1984, Congress won 414 seats with 49.1% of the vote—a record in Indian politics. In 1989, its vote share fell to 40.62% and seats to 197. Meanwhile, BJP rose from 2 seats in 1984 to 88 in 1989, with only a modest increase in vote share to 11.87% from 7.74%. This demonstrates that seat counts depend not only on vote percentage but also on regional distribution. Even Rajiv Gandhi expressed disbelief at how a mere 4% increase in BJP’s vote share could yield such a surge in seats.

The “Brazilian Model” Controversy

Rahul Gandhi alleged that a Brazilian model had voted under multiple identities at 22 polling stations. His team even circulated photographs. The model herself released a video denying the claim. Verification showed that the voter ID cards carried the original photographs of Indian women, not the model’s. Several women came forward publicly with their IDs to prove the truth.

It appears Gandhi’s team may have deliberately inserted the model’s photo to sensationalize the issue. This incident severely damaged Congress’s credibility.

The Election Commission and government should form a special investigation team to probe this fraud. If it is proven that Gandhi’s team engaged in deception, strict action must follow to preserve the dignity of Indian democracy and its institutions.

House Numbers and Voter Lists

Gandhi also claimed that hundreds of voters were registered under a single house number. But in many Indian towns, traditional structures like “ Hata or Ahatas” contain dozens of homes and hundreds of residents. Thus, multiple voters under one house number is not unusual.

As for houses listed with “zero” numbers, many small villages still lack assigned building numbers. In databases, if the house number field is mandatory, “0” is often entered as a placeholder. This is a technical necessity, not fraud.

Congress’s Challenges and Direction

The Congress Party has historically played a central role in Indian politics. Yet after 11 years out of power at the center, it is now in deep introspection. Rahul Gandhi, despite holding various positions and being the face of the opposition, has not succeeded in energizing the organization. Congress’s presence is now limited to a few states. In Odisha and Punjab, the party has lost ground, while in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar its presence is negligible.

Nationally, Congress’s role has also diminished. If it relies solely on regional parties to gain power, it risks losing its independent identity and falling prey to instability and ideological imbalance, as seen during UPA-II. Today, Congress’s biggest challenge is not BJP but regional parties that have divided its traditional vote base.

Unless Congress rethinks its ideology and alliance strategy, and adopts an inclusive nationwide vision beyond sectarian appeasement or vote-bank politics, it risks being reduced to a minority-interest party.

Conclusion

Rahul Gandhi’s “hydrogen bomb” statements are not benefiting Congress; instead, they are weakening it. As investigations reveal facts, Congress’s credibility suffers further. Repeatedly casting doubt on the dignity of Indian democracy undermines public trust.

Politics cannot run on sensational accusations. The people seek solid facts and reliability. In this climate, Rahul Gandhi himself is proving to be a self-destructive bomb for his own party.

~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

 

Why Supreme Court slams UP Conversion Law || Is India's Supreme Court Communal?

 

---

Supreme Court slams UP Conversion Law || Is India's Supreme Court Communal? || Why is there such a contradiction between the decisions of the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court, who is right and who is wrong? ||

---

The Supreme Court's anti-Hindu stance has once again come to the fore. While the Supreme Court's anti-Hindu stance is not new, it is reaffirmed from time to time when its decisions are extremely suicidal for the country. Surprisingly, these decisions also serve to cover up and indirectly aid the conspiracies of the Left-Islamic alliance, which is constantly striving against Hindus and to transform India into an Islamic nation.

The Supreme Court recently commented on and quashed several cases registered under Uttar Pradesh's anti-conversion law, the "Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021." Specifically, the court quashed five cases registered in Fatehpur district, which were registered for Christian conversions. Although the Prayagraj High Court had considered the matter extensively and upheld the lawful police action, the Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra stated in its 158-page judgment that there was no substantial evidence or legal basis in these cases, and thus, the prosecutions were a "travesty of justice." The court stated that criminal law cannot be a means of harassing innocent citizens. The bench also initially raised several questions about the constitutionality of the law, stating that its procedures violate individual privacy, liberty, and the constitutional spirit of secularism. While the court did not declare the entire law unconstitutional, it stated that excessive government control and conditions imposed on citizens seeking religious conversion were a worrying aspect of the law. With this observation, the Supreme Court justified the process of forced conversion through deception and coercion. Why is there such a contradiction between the views of the High Court and the Supreme Court? Both cannot be right; one must be wrong. The Supreme Court petition was merely seeking the cancellation of FIRs, but the judges respectfully obliged the petitioners with gifts which served as a lesson to those who dared to take action against them.

The Uttar Pradesh government enacted the Prevention of Religious Conversion Act in 2021. It provides that anyone wishing to convert their religion in Uttar Pradesh must submit a declaration to a magistrate 60 days in advance, stating that they are doing so without any coercion. The person conducting the conversion must also inform the magistrate 30 days in advance. The magistrate then orders a police investigation. Once the conversion is complete, the person must again inform the magistrate within 60 days, providing identifying information. This information is then posted on a notice board. The person then has to appear before the magistrate within 21 days to confirm their identity and credentials. In July 2024, the Uttar Pradesh government passed the "Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2024," which further tightened the provisions of the law. These amendments provided for punishment of up to life imprisonment for forced or fraudulent conversion. Anyone can file an FIR in cases of conversion, whereas previously only the victim or their family could file a complaint. Any attempt to convert someone by offering inducements or concealing identity would be considered a cognizable offense and non-bailable. In such cases, action will be taken under Sections 298 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which carry a punishment of up to 10 years.

The case, related to the alleged mass conversion at the Evangelical Church of India in Fatehpur, was filed by a member of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, naming 35 named and 20 unidentified individuals as accused. In another case, an FIR was filed against Rajendra Bihari Lal, Vice Chancellor of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture and Technology (formerly Allahabad Agricultural Institute,) in Naini, Prayagraj, and other officials on charges of forced mass conversions to Christianity. Every student at the university and nearly everyone in Prayagraj can tell that Lal has been involved in conversions for decades.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court cited the case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, which stated that secularism is an integral part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The Court stated that the Preamble of the Constitution guarantees an individual the freedom to choose their religion, thought, faith, and belief. Furthermore, in its comments, the bench cited cases such as K.S. Puttaswamy and Shafin Jahan, which emphasized privacy and personal liberty as paramount. The Supreme Court stated that while it was not deciding the validity of the law, the conversion law initially impacts individual freedom and privacy.

Everyone should remember that India is secular only as long as Hindus are in the majority. Wherever Hindus are becoming a minority, or are being made so systematically,Communalism is gaining ground there. Gradually, the number of Hindus in seven states has declined to 2.5% in Lakshadweep, 2.7% in Mizoram, 8.7% in Nagaland, 11.5% in Meghalaya, 28% in Jammu and Kashmir, 29% in Arunachal Pradesh, and 38% in Punjab. Technically, although the Hindu population in Kerala is over 50%, which includes atheists and leftists who naturally oppose Hindus and are not Hindus by practice & life style. If these are excluded, Hindus constitute approximately 30%.

Very few people know that approximately 100 million Hindus were massacred in India by cruel, violent, and demonic Islamic invaders, subjecting them to horrific torture, which is the largest genocide on earth. Yet, even after this, they could not convert India into an Islamic nation. Now, through Ghazwa-e-Hind, the Muslim population is being increased as compared to Hindus to transform India into a Darul Islam, or Islamic nation. Love Jihad, religious conversions, and illegal infiltration are being used as weapons by islamic fundamentalists. The cooperation and support of the judiciary, administration, and so called intellectuals is being sought for this. Currently, there is a competition between Christian and Islamic fundamentalists to achieve maximum conversions. This is directly or indirectly supported by the judiciary and politicians.

There is no doubt that the anti-national and anti-Hindu nature of the Supreme Court is due to the collegium's selection process of judges, in which most judges are primarily selected from an anti-Hindu background who are closely aligned with Islamic-leftist ideology. Therefore, it is impossible for their decisions to be free from any anti-Hindu and anti-Sanatan sentiments. Although the Supreme Court's responsibility is to protect the Constitution, but the country is far greater than the Constitution. Therefore, the country comes first, than the Constitution. If the country itself is not survive, how can the Constitution will survive?

World history bears witness that in every country where the leftist Islamic alliance became dominant and wherever the policy of Muslim appeasement was adopted, those countries became Islamic. If Supreme Court judges continue to patronize fundamentalists in the name of secularism, the situation in India could rapidly deteriorate. Nowhere in the world are secularism and individual freedom given more importance than national unity and integrity, and cultural preservation.

The Supreme Court of India has completely failed in its role as the guardian of the Constitution. The original Constitution did not include the words secularism and socialism in the Preamble. The Waqf Board, Minority Commission, Places of Worship Act, reservation, Temple Acquisition Act, etc., were not the part of original constitution but were added later. The Places of Worship Act of 1991 is a constitutional fraud, implemented retrospectively from August 15, 1947, and its effect dates back to the seventh century, when the Islamic invaders began their invasions. Rebuilding Hindu religious sites and temples destroyed by invaders was impossible not only during Muslim rule, but also during the subsequent 200-year rule by the British. After independence, the Congress government created so many obstacles that the Somnath Temple could barely be rebuilt, while all other religious sites remained in ruins. The Places of Worship Act of 1991 halted all future efforts to preserve and revive India's cultural and religious heritage, but the Supreme Court remained silent because this anti-Hindu law was essentially designed to appease Muslims, and this also appeals to the Supreme Court. Therefore, it did not even entertain any petition to review this law.

In the context of the Supreme Court's harsh comments on the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law, there will be calls for its repeal, and all political parties involved in appeasement will support it in the name of protecting minority rights. Naturally, this will lead to communal polarization and directly support the conversion mafia, boosting their morale, leading to a rapid increase in conversions. In the long run, this trend of conversions will impact the rural population, especially in rural and tribal areas. This will ultimately lead to India's conversion to a Islamic Country.

Since the Modi government appears helpless and powerless before the Supreme Court, it is the duty of every patriot to create awareness among all nationalists and strongly oppose such anti-national decisions.

~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~