India’s “Internal” Crisis Exposed Amid Iran–Israel/US Conflict

---

India’s “Internal” Crisis Exposed Amid Iran–Israel/US Conflict | Even America’s Praiseworthy Actions Become Debatable | After Israel, Could India Be Iran’s Next Target?

Even though a two-week ceasefire has been reached between Iran, Israel, and the United States, considering it as peace would be a fatal mistake. This is merely a pause—not the end of the war. While the world breathes a sigh of relief, for India, this is a time for introspection.

Ironically, when U.S. President Donald Trump was facing both global and domestic pressures, and organizations like NATO appeared fragmented, a different kind of “war” was being fought across India and the world—a war of narratives.

---

Impact of Polarization in Europe

Growing social polarization in several European countries has begun to influence their foreign policies. The hesitation of countries like France, Britain, Italy, and Spain to directly support U.S. military operations has raised serious questions about the unity of organizations like NATO.

---

Display of ‘Foreign Loyalty’ Within India

Mentally and strategically, India stands with Israel, yet appeasement politics still compels it to appear supportive of Palestine. The situation worsened when a section of Indian media mocked Trump as “unstable” and portrayed Iran as if it had brought a superpower to its knees.

When reports emerged about Pakistan’s mediation, critics flooded in, calling India’s foreign policy a failure. Leaders like Asaduddin Owaisi even termed it Prime Minister Modi’s mistake. Isn’t it ironic that while the country’s leadership is engaged in diplomacy during a global crisis, some people within the country seem to side with foreign powers?

---

From Lucknow to Kashmir: The ‘Iran Loyalty Test’

The recent visit of Dr. Abdul Majid Hakim Elahi, a representative of Iran’s Supreme Leader, to Lucknow and Kashmir raises many questions. Should support be sought from a government or from a specific community?

Protests in Kashmir in support of Iran turned violent. Can this be considered patriotism? Absolutely not. When demonstrations go against the country’s declared foreign policy and include anti-national slogans, it clearly amounts to sedition.

What is even more surprising is that Indian women reportedly donated their jewelry to support Iran’s war efforts. Communities collected funds to ensure Iran would not face a shortage of resources for war.

This raises a serious question: should resources meant for India’s development be diverted to fuel a foreign war? Are these individuals prioritizing India or their religious identity?

---

‘Islamization’ of Europe: A Warning for India

The kind of communal issues India faces today are now emerging in Europe (France, Britain, Italy, Spain). Illegal immigration has altered demographic structures to the point where governments hesitate to support NATO.

Appeasement and vote-bank politics have created cracks even in powerful organizations like NATO. This is a strong lesson for India—if demographic imbalance and illegal immigration are not addressed in time, India’s foreign policy may again become hostage to internal pressures.

---

The Narrative Game: When Extremism Surpasses Even ‘Mecca’

Iran launched missiles at Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar, yet radical groups worldwide continued to support Iran. Why? Because in certain ideological narratives, the most extreme position garners the most support.

Through sermons and messaging, a global narrative has been spread portraying Iran as a defender of Islam under attack. This has led citizens in many countries to stand against their own governments.

Iran has positioned itself as a leading supporter of Palestine and has maintained ties with groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, further complicating the conflict. If Iran were to accept Israel’s existence and stop supporting such groups, tensions could decrease—but current conditions suggest otherwise.

---

From Ancient Persia to Modern Sharia: The Decline of a Civilization

Historically, Iran referred to itself as “Iran,” derived from the ancient Avestan term meaning “Land of the Aryans.” In the Sassanian era, it was known as “Iran-shahr”—the empire of the Aryans.

Once known as Persia, it was a great ancient civilization closely connected with India. Both cultures shared traditions of nature worship. However, Islamic conquests eventually overtook this civilization.

The 1979 Islamic Revolution transformed Iran into a strict Sharia state. Large-scale violence during that period is rarely remembered today. Following this, the U.S. imposed sanctions on Iran, which continue to this day.

---

A Direct Threat to India: Are We the Next Target?

Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei has repeatedly raised issues about Kashmir and alleged oppression of Muslims in India, openly invoking the idea of jihad.

Consider the possibilities:

If Iran becomes a nuclear power, its first target could be Israel—and possibly India next.
If Iran and Pakistan align under a “Muslim Brotherhood”-type framework, it could pose a serious threat to India’s existence.
Radicalized pockets within India could become internal vulnerabilities in such a scenario.

During the conflict, it became evident that Iran possesses substantial military capabilities—missiles, drones, and advanced weapons. If combined with nuclear power, this could significantly alter regional balance.

---

A Conflict Beyond Borders

This conflict is not merely territorial—it is a complex intersection of ideology, identity, and power balance. A ceasefire offers temporary relief, but lasting peace requires mutual recognition of sovereignty and dialogue over ideological confrontation.

A sensitive question arises: if geopolitical conditions change and tensions emerge between India and Iran, what form might that take? Currently, direct military conflict is unlikely, but regional dynamics—especially involving Pakistan—could complicate matters.

---

National Interest Above All

U.S. sanctions on Iran are not just about protecting Israel but also about preventing a potentially nuclear extremist state. Sometimes, preventing violence requires displays of strength.

Today, Iran’s own population struggles under its regime, with a damaged infrastructure and weak economy.

India must be clear—its sympathies should lie not with any foreign ideological state but with its own national interests and security.

Those in India collecting funds for Iran must understand: if India faces a crisis tomorrow, Iranian missiles will not come to their rescue.

Therefore—Nation First, Always First.

          ~ Shiv Mishra

 

It’s Not Just Bengal—The Entire Nation Stands Shamed

 

---

It’s Not Just Bengal—The Entire Nation Stands Shamed: Mamata’s Defiance and the Modi Government’s Helplessness

 

 Crumbling Walls in the Fortress of Democracy

West Bengal, once revered as the "Center of the Indian Renaissance" for its intellectual consciousness and cultural purity, is today trapped in an endless vortex of political violence and administrative decay. In the current scenario, a vital question arises: Is the administration of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee solely responsible for what is transpiring in Bengal, or is the Modi government at the Center also indirectly responsible due to its "silent consent" or "strategic compulsions"? In a federal structure, when the fundamental rights and safety of citizens are being trampled upon, the Center's inaction raises serious questions about the nation's integrity.

The Malda Incident: The Judiciary Held Hostage

What recently occurred in the Kaliachak area of Malda district is a dark chapter in the history of modern Indian democracy. On the explicit instructions of the Supreme Court, seven judicial officers—including three women—engaged in the Special Summary Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls were held hostage in broad daylight by a frenzied mob.

This incident was not merely a criminal act; it was a direct assault on the dignity of the judiciary. Despite constant requests and interventions from the Calcutta High Court, no senior police or administrative officer reached the spot for hours. This dereliction of duty is not a result of administrative oversight but a clear sign of high-level political pressure. When the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court himself has to stay awake all night to ensure the safety of judicial officers, and the police force arrives only at 1:00 AM, it becomes evident that "Law of the Ruler" has replaced the "Rule of Law" in the state.

The Truth of Electoral Rolls and 'Fake Voters'

The SIR work was not an ordinary administrative task. It was an impartial effort by judicial officers appointed by the Election Commission and the Supreme Court to resolve complaints made by Mamata Banerjee, who had accused the Commission of bias. However, when these officers began their work, they were met with violence and intimidation.

The root cause of this violence is deep-seated. The presence of judicial officers created a fear of exposing the "fake voter" network, which the ruling party has allegedly used to ensure its electoral victories. Had suspicious names been removed from the rolls, the current government’s electoral ground would have shifted. This insecurity incited the mob that pelted stones at the officers' convoy. This stands as proof of the lowest ebb of Indian democracy.

Historical Comparison: From Lucknow to Kolkata

A similar example of political decline was witnessed in Uttar Pradesh during Mulayam Singh Yadav's tenure, when Samajwadi Party workers launched an "Halla Bol" attack on the Lucknow Bench of the High Court and orchestrated the "State Guest House Scandal" against Mayawati. However, the then-Governor, Motilal Vora, showed the courage to dismiss the government immediately. In contrast, the situation in Bengal is such that even the Governor does not feel safe. The Malda incident has proven that upcoming elections are not just a political process but a test for the survival of constitutional institutions.

Supreme Court’s Sharp Observation and NIA Investigation

Given the gravity of the situation, a three-member bench headed by the Chief Justice took suo motu cognizance. The court termed it a "collapse of the constitutional machinery." Issuing contempt notices to the Chief Secretary, DGP, and Home Secretary shows the extent to which the administrative machinery has been politicized. The court explicitly stated that this was no coincidence but a "planned and motivated" incident aimed at breaking judicial morale. Currently, the NIA has initiated an investigation, confirming that the matter relates not just to law and order but to national security and electoral sanctity.

The 'Mysterious' Silence of the Central Government

The most disturbing fact is that despite the Election Commission replacing the State’s Chief Secretary and DGP, the newly appointed officers also appear to be working under the same "Syndicate." This raises the question: Why is the Modi government hesitating to use Article 356 (President's Rule)?

Mamata Banerjee has a specific skill—blaming every violent incident on her opponents. Even now, there is a possibility that state agencies (CID) will make scapegoats out of members of opposition parties to keep the Muslim vote bank polarized in her favor. Why is the Modi government, which is usually vocal on issues of nationalism, remaining a "mute spectator" in the case of Bengal? Is it a wait for political gain or a lack of courage?

---

A Long and Bloodied Chain of Violence in Bengal

To understand the current state of Bengal, it is necessary to look at these horrific events of recent years:

RG Kar Medical College Case (2024): The heinous rape and murder of a woman doctor at her workplace. The suspicious attitude of the administration and allegations of evidence tampering.
Sandeshkhali Violence (2024): Systematic sexual harassment of women and an organized system of land grabbing by leaders like Shahjahan Sheikh.
Bogtui Massacre (2022): Burning 10 people alive, including women and children. The Calcutta High Court termed it "barbaric."
2021 Post-Poll Violence: Widespread violence following election results, which the NHRC termed as state-sponsored.
Communal Riots: Violence in Canning (2013), Dhulagarh (2016), Basirhat (2017), and Rishra (2023) proved that the policy of appeasement has shredded the state's social fabric.

The 'Syndicate' Raj of Scams

The power in Bengal rests not only on violence but also on a massive machinery of corruption.

Teacher Recruitment Scam (SSC): Recovery of crores in cash from a minister’s residence, jeopardizing the future of thousands of meritorious students.
Saradha and Rose Valley: Ponzi schemes that swallowed the hard-earned savings of millions of poor people, with links reaching the corridors of power.

Infiltration: A Threat to National Security

By turning Bangladeshi and Rohingya infiltrators into a vote bank, Mamata Banerjee has established a record that is proving more dangerous than even the separatism in Kashmir. Changing demographics in border districts and providing government protection to infiltrators is a direct gamble with the nation's unity and integrity.

Conclusion: A Call to Duty for the Nation

It is concerning that the Central Government has taken no concrete steps even after repeated insults to the Prime Minister, Home Minister, and individuals holding constitutional posts. If the Center leaves Bengal to burn for the sake of political profit-and-loss calculations, it will be an abdication of its duty toward the nation.

The anarchy in Bengal has today become a "Gateway"—for infiltration, for corruption, and for constitutional defiance. The time has come to rise above politics and re-establish the Rule of Law in Bengal. If Bengal is not saved today, maintaining the nation's unity will become an impossible challenge tomorrow. The crisis in Bengal is not just a state crisis; it is a question of the very identity of Indian democracy.

 

 

Fake Dalits vs Real Dalits - New Reservation Policy 2026 based on Supreme Court Verdict

 

---

Supreme Court Verdict: Fake Dalits vs Real Dalits

“Dalits who have converted to Christianity or Islam will no longer be able to claim Dalit benefits.”

Dalits who converted to Christianity or Islam will no longer be entitled to the benefits reserved for Dalits. This Supreme Court ruling comes at a time when, for the past 75 years, constitutional provisions were being openly flouted, allowing converts to continue enjoying these privileges. Dalits were often easy targets for conversion, lured with promises of freedom from caste discrimination while still retaining caste-based reservations and other benefits — essentially, enjoying both worlds. This racket, nurtured under successive Congress governments, has continued unchecked even under the nose of the central government.

On 24 March 2026, a bench comprising Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice N.V. Anjaria delivered a landmark judgment in the case Chintada Anand vs State of Andhra Pradesh. The case involved Chintada Anand, a Christian pastor born into a Dalit family, who converted to Christianity but filed a case under the SC/ST Act after allegedly being attacked, claiming protection as a Dalit by birth. The lower courts and the High Court challenged this, arguing that as a Christian he no longer qualified as Scheduled Caste.

The Supreme Court clarified that once a person adopts Christianity or Islam, their Scheduled Caste status ceases immediately and completely. The Court cited Paragraph 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, which states that only Hindus, Sikhs, or Buddhists can be recognized as Scheduled Castes. Since Anand had become a Christian, he was no longer a member of the Scheduled Castes and thus could not claim protection under the SC/ST Act or avail of government reservations.

This ruling is historic, but it also raises serious questions: who is responsible for the fraud perpetrated against the constitutional system for 75 years — politicians, governments, or even the judiciary?

The misuse of reservations and constitutional safeguards meant to uplift Dalits has been alarming. The greatest loss has been borne by genuine Dalits, whose rightful share was usurped by “fake Dalits” — converts to Christianity and Islam. Had this not happened, their condition today would have been far better.

The irony is that these fake Dalits, under various organizational banners, are now confronting the general and upper castes in UGC-related matters, aided by anti-Hindu forces that provide them financial support and resources to sow social discord.

The Supreme Court has now put an end to the practice of converts continuing to enjoy caste certificates and benefits while being Christians or Muslims on paper. The implications of this ruling are vast, and its direct beneficiaries will be the genuine Dalit communities.

From now on, Dalits who have converted to Christianity or Islam will not be entitled to reservations in government jobs, promotions, or admissions in educational institutions. They will also lose access to concessions such as fee waivers, free coaching, job application subsidies, and other government facilities. They cannot file cases under the SC/ST Act for alleged atrocities, nor contest elections from seats reserved for Scheduled Castes.

 

The Scheduled Caste status is rooted in the historical evil of “untouchability,” recognized under Article 341 of the Constitution through the Presidential Order of 1950. This status is limited to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists. Thus, a Dalit who converts to Christianity or Islam legally forfeits their Scheduled Caste identity.

The Court also clarified that this rule does not apply to Scheduled Tribes, whose status is determined not by religion but by ethnography and distinct cultural identity under Article 342. A tribal’s identity is defined by ancestry, language, customs, and geographical isolation — traits unaffected by conversion.

Yet even here, backdoor manipulations are rampant. In Jharkhand, for instance, Bangladeshi infiltrators have married local tribal women and converted them to Islam. Their children lose ethnic and cultural identity, making their continued recognition as Scheduled Tribes a fraud. The central government must urgently amend constitutional provisions to prevent the extinction of indigenous tribal groups.

Meanwhile, Muslims have been granted benefits under the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category, much like Dalits under SC, due to vote-bank politics and appeasement. Based on the Mandal Commission’s recommendations, 27% reservation for OBCs was introduced in 1990 and upheld by the Supreme Court in 1992. Unlike SCs, where the 1950 Presidential Order restricts eligibility to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists, no such restriction exists for OBCs.

Several state governments have extended OBC benefits to Muslims. Except for Syeds, Sheikhs, Mughals, and Pathans (less than 10% of Muslims), the rest have been classified as “Pasmanda” and included in OBCs.

This raises a glaring inconsistency: if a Dalit loses SC benefits upon converting to Christianity, how can a Muslim retain OBC benefits after conversion? The Supreme Court must address this anomaly, though expecting the central government to act may be futile, given that even BJP-ruled states have already included many Muslim castes in OBC lists.

This is the fundamental question: if conversion promised equality but failed to change social realities, then what was the purpose of conversion? Is this merely a systemic anomaly, or a deliberate conspiracy to weaken Hindu society and alter India’s national character?

The Supreme Court’s ruling against fake Dalits is not final; review petitions may be filed, and the government could legislate to override it, as seen earlier with the SC/ST Act.

Most crucially, the Modi government has set up a commission headed by former Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan to study whether Dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims should be granted Scheduled Caste status. The commission is expected to submit its report in April this year. If it concludes that conversion has not improved their socio-economic condition, the government could amend the 1950 Order to include Christians and Muslims alongside Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists. In that case, the Supreme Court’s ruling would automatically become ineffective.

The very formation of this commission suggests such an intention. Even if the Modi government does not act, future governments could revive and implement the report, just as V.P. Singh did with the Mandal Commission. Thus, the Balakrishnan Commission report could prove to be a seed of discord.

Whatever the outcome, the greatest harm of including fake Dalits and fake OBCs in reserved quotas will be borne by genuine Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and OBCs. The sooner they realize this, the better; otherwise, this system will prove disastrous for both them and the nation.

— Shiv Mishra

---