Bhagwat’s Cultural Nationalism vs. Madani’s “Bloody Warning”| Ideological Difference or an Ominous Sign of Confrontation? 

Recently, RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat called for a return to cultural roots through the concept of “Ghar Wapsi” (homecoming), which he described as “cultural unity.” According to him, this appeal was meant for all those who had left Hinduism and adopted other religions, including Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, and others. However, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind and Darul Uloom Deoband chief Arshad Madani immediately responded with a warning of a “bloody conflict.” This is not only alarming but also suggests that radical leadership is now resorting to threats of bloodshed rather than engaging in constitutional discourse. This is not merely a clash of opposing ideologies, but a clear warning of potential civil strife.

Every political party in India, driven by vote-bank politics, has allegedly nurtured extremist elements, and no government — including those considered pro-Hindu — has seriously attempted to control them. The present situation has not arisen accidentally.

 

From Dialogue to Confrontation: Statement and Reaction

Earlier, in the context of the Gyanvapi temple issue, Mohan Bhagwat had urged the Hindu community not to search for a Shivling in every mosque. At that time, Madani had welcomed his statement. When Bhagwat visited mosques to promote harmony and met with clerics, his efforts were appreciated. On one occasion, when he remarked that Hinduism recognizes 330 million deities and that Prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ could also be included in that spirit of inclusivity, Madani had openly praised him.

So what is different about the “Ghar Wapsi” statement? It is merely an appeal to those who left Hinduism to return to their ancestral faith and reconnect with their cultural roots.

 

Changing Demographic Equations: Fear or Reality?

According to security agencies and think tanks (such as reports cited by Vision IAS), some radical organizations are promoting the ideology of “Ghazwa-e-Hind.” Their alleged objective is to transform India into an Islamic nation. The spread of radical content on social media and the radicalization of youth pose serious national security challenges. If not addressed in time, this could lead to internal unrest and communal violence.

Through alleged inducements, deception, and “love jihad,” large-scale demographic change is claimed to be underway. Particularly in tribal regions and economically weaker sections, missionary activities and radical groups are seen as a serious concern.

Many countries across the world are reportedly struggling with demographic shifts driven by radical ideologies. In several regions of India, Hindus becoming a minority is described not merely as a fear but as a statistical reality. Several districts in West Bengal, Assam, and Kerala are cited as examples of such demographic change. Religious conversion driven by economic incentives and psychological pressure is portrayed as a “time bomb” for India’s internal security. If demographic security is not addressed today, India may lose its democratic identity in the coming decades.

We should learn from countries that, in the name of liberalism, compromised their borders and cultural identity. Nations like France and Sweden are often cited as examples of societies grappling with “parallel communities.” Lebanon’s decline is presented as evidence of how demographic shifts can push a once prosperous nation into civil war.

 

Legislative Intervention and Political Silence

To counter what is described as the Ghazwa-e-Hind agenda aiming to turn India into an Islamic nation by 2047, strong legislative intervention is deemed necessary. It is claimed that a related fatwa remains available on the Deoband seminary’s website, justified under the constitutional right to religious freedom.

Meanwhile, the Modi government speaks of transforming India into a developed nation by 2047. However, critics ask whether that developed India will remain secular or become Islamic. The larger question is whether silence amounts to indirect appeasement. Instead of appeasement, a policy of “national protection” is urged to prevent potential national transformation. This, it is argued, is necessary not only for the country but also for political survival, especially in light of controversies such as the UGC issue.

 

Global Perspective: Is There a Need to Learn from the World?

Considering global examples of Islamization or demographic change affecting social and political structures, India as an emerging power requires a multidimensional strategy. Lessons from countries such as Sweden, France, and Belgium are cited as relevant for immediate action.

 

A Seven-Point  suggestion to Modi Govt. 

The following measures are proposed as a seven-point solution:

1. Uniform Civil Code (One Nation, One Law):

Legal concessions based on religion are described as fertile ground for extremism.

2. Strict Population Control Law:

A uniform two-child norm for all citizens, without religious discrimination.

3. National Register of Citizens (NRC) and Strong Border Management:

Identification and deportation of illegal infiltrators; secure borders are essential.

4. Comprehensive Reform of Waqf Laws:

Close legal loopholes allegedly enabling land encroachment.

5. Anti-Radicalization Law:

Strict action under sedition laws against those promoting communal hatred, forced conversions, “love jihad,” or threatening violence.

6. Uniform National Education Policy:

Curtailing radicalism by reforming or restricting madrasa education.

7. Restoration of National Pride:

Renaming monuments glorifying invaders and restoring ancient cultural and religious sites. Without removing symbols of subjugation, liberation from a colonial mindset is considered impossible.

Without restoring ancient glory and national identity, no nation can truly be independent.

 

Economic Rise vs. Internal Challenges

“Ultimately, India in 2026 stands at a crossroads. On one hand, a $4.2 trillion economy and 7.5% growth rate have brought it to the threshold of becoming a global superpower. On the other hand, institutions like the Waqf Board with vast powers and demographic imbalances pose internal challenges to its foundations. If the administration of 940,000 Waqf properties lacks transparency and demographic changes continue in border regions, economic prosperity may not be sustainable.”

 

The Path to ‘Vishwaguru’: Culture Beyond Industry

India’s journey to becoming a “Vishwaguru” (global teacher) does not pass only through factories and digital infrastructure; it requires keeping Sanatan culture alive and relevant. Legislative reforms are needed to ensure that the Constitution stands above all religious laws and parallel authorities. Reform of Waqf laws and demographic security are described not as religious issues but as matters of national integrity. History shows that nations reaching economic heights have had secure internal foundations and strong traditional social structures.

Nation-building, social unity, and integrity are not solely the government’s responsibility. Public trust in the Modi government, it is argued, has been shaken after the UGC episode. With political parties deeply entrenched in appeasement and caste politics, the question arises: who will safeguard the nation?

India’s democratic and secular structure remains secure only as long as its core cultural identity remains intact. In present circumstances, citizens must commit themselves not only to economic progress but also to vigilance regarding social changes. When society awakens, governments feel compelled to take firm decisions. Remember, vigilant citizens are the first line of defense for a secure India.

                                              ~~~~~~~~ Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~