Supreme Court slams UP Conversion Law || Is India's Supreme Court Communal? || Why is there such a contradiction between the decisions of the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court, who is right and who is wrong? ||
The Supreme Court's anti-Hindu stance has once again come to the fore. While the Supreme Court's anti-Hindu stance is not new, it is reaffirmed from time to time when its decisions are extremely suicidal for the country. Surprisingly, these decisions also serve to cover up and indirectly aid the conspiracies of the Left-Islamic alliance, which is constantly striving against Hindus and to transform India into an Islamic nation.
The Supreme Court recently commented on and quashed several cases registered under Uttar Pradesh's anti-conversion law, the "Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021." Specifically, the court quashed five cases registered in Fatehpur district, which were registered for Christian conversions. Although the Prayagraj High Court had considered the matter extensively and upheld the lawful police action, the Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra stated in its 158-page judgment that there was no substantial evidence or legal basis in these cases, and thus, the prosecutions were a "travesty of justice." The court stated that criminal law cannot be a means of harassing innocent citizens. The bench also initially raised several questions about the constitutionality of the law, stating that its procedures violate individual privacy, liberty, and the constitutional spirit of secularism. While the court did not declare the entire law unconstitutional, it stated that excessive government control and conditions imposed on citizens seeking religious conversion were a worrying aspect of the law. With this observation, the Supreme Court justified the process of forced conversion through deception and coercion. Why is there such a contradiction between the views of the High Court and the Supreme Court? Both cannot be right; one must be wrong. The Supreme Court petition was merely seeking the cancellation of FIRs, but the judges respectfully obliged the petitioners with gifts which served as a lesson to those who dared to take action against them.
The Uttar Pradesh government enacted the Prevention of Religious Conversion Act in 2021. It provides that anyone wishing to convert their religion in Uttar Pradesh must submit a declaration to a magistrate 60 days in advance, stating that they are doing so without any coercion. The person conducting the conversion must also inform the magistrate 30 days in advance. The magistrate then orders a police investigation. Once the conversion is complete, the person must again inform the magistrate within 60 days, providing identifying information. This information is then posted on a notice board. The person then has to appear before the magistrate within 21 days to confirm their identity and credentials. In July 2024, the Uttar Pradesh government passed the "Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2024," which further tightened the provisions of the law. These amendments provided for punishment of up to life imprisonment for forced or fraudulent conversion. Anyone can file an FIR in cases of conversion, whereas previously only the victim or their family could file a complaint. Any attempt to convert someone by offering inducements or concealing identity would be considered a cognizable offense and non-bailable. In such cases, action will be taken under Sections 298 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which carry a punishment of up to 10 years.
The case, related to the alleged mass conversion at the Evangelical Church of India in Fatehpur, was filed by a member of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, naming 35 named and 20 unidentified individuals as accused. In another case, an FIR was filed against Rajendra Bihari Lal, Vice Chancellor of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture and Technology (formerly Allahabad Agricultural Institute,) in Naini, Prayagraj, and other officials on charges of forced mass conversions to Christianity. Every student at the university and nearly everyone in Prayagraj can tell that Lal has been involved in conversions for decades.
In its judgment, the Supreme Court cited the case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, which stated that secularism is an integral part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The Court stated that the Preamble of the Constitution guarantees an individual the freedom to choose their religion, thought, faith, and belief. Furthermore, in its comments, the bench cited cases such as K.S. Puttaswamy and Shafin Jahan, which emphasized privacy and personal liberty as paramount. The Supreme Court stated that while it was not deciding the validity of the law, the conversion law initially impacts individual freedom and privacy.
Everyone should remember that India is secular only as long as Hindus are in the majority. Wherever Hindus are becoming a minority, or are being made so systematically,Communalism is gaining ground there. Gradually, the number of Hindus in seven states has declined to 2.5% in Lakshadweep, 2.7% in Mizoram, 8.7% in Nagaland, 11.5% in Meghalaya, 28% in Jammu and Kashmir, 29% in Arunachal Pradesh, and 38% in Punjab. Technically, although the Hindu population in Kerala is over 50%, which includes atheists and leftists who naturally oppose Hindus and are not Hindus by practice & life style. If these are excluded, Hindus constitute approximately 30%.
Very few people know that approximately 100 million Hindus were massacred in India by cruel, violent, and demonic Islamic invaders, subjecting them to horrific torture, which is the largest genocide on earth. Yet, even after this, they could not convert India into an Islamic nation. Now, through Ghazwa-e-Hind, the Muslim population is being increased as compared to Hindus to transform India into a Darul Islam, or Islamic nation. Love Jihad, religious conversions, and illegal infiltration are being used as weapons by islamic fundamentalists. The cooperation and support of the judiciary, administration, and so called intellectuals is being sought for this. Currently, there is a competition between Christian and Islamic fundamentalists to achieve maximum conversions. This is directly or indirectly supported by the judiciary and politicians.
There is no doubt that the anti-national and anti-Hindu nature of the Supreme Court is due to the collegium's selection process of judges, in which most judges are primarily selected from an anti-Hindu background who are closely aligned with Islamic-leftist ideology. Therefore, it is impossible for their decisions to be free from any anti-Hindu and anti-Sanatan sentiments. Although the Supreme Court's responsibility is to protect the Constitution, but the country is far greater than the Constitution. Therefore, the country comes first, than the Constitution. If the country itself is not survive, how can the Constitution will survive?
World history bears witness that in every country where the leftist Islamic alliance became dominant and wherever the policy of Muslim appeasement was adopted, those countries became Islamic. If Supreme Court judges continue to patronize fundamentalists in the name of secularism, the situation in India could rapidly deteriorate. Nowhere in the world are secularism and individual freedom given more importance than national unity and integrity, and cultural preservation.
The Supreme Court of India has completely failed in its role as the guardian of the Constitution. The original Constitution did not include the words secularism and socialism in the Preamble. The Waqf Board, Minority Commission, Places of Worship Act, reservation, Temple Acquisition Act, etc., were not the part of original constitution but were added later. The Places of Worship Act of 1991 is a constitutional fraud, implemented retrospectively from August 15, 1947, and its effect dates back to the seventh century, when the Islamic invaders began their invasions. Rebuilding Hindu religious sites and temples destroyed by invaders was impossible not only during Muslim rule, but also during the subsequent 200-year rule by the British. After independence, the Congress government created so many obstacles that the Somnath Temple could barely be rebuilt, while all other religious sites remained in ruins. The Places of Worship Act of 1991 halted all future efforts to preserve and revive India's cultural and religious heritage, but the Supreme Court remained silent because this anti-Hindu law was essentially designed to appease Muslims, and this also appeals to the Supreme Court. Therefore, it did not even entertain any petition to review this law.
In the context of the Supreme Court's harsh comments on the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law, there will be calls for its repeal, and all political parties involved in appeasement will support it in the name of protecting minority rights. Naturally, this will lead to communal polarization and directly support the conversion mafia, boosting their morale, leading to a rapid increase in conversions. In the long run, this trend of conversions will impact the rural population, especially in rural and tribal areas. This will ultimately lead to India's conversion to a Islamic Country.
Since the Modi government appears helpless and powerless before the Supreme Court, it is the duty of every patriot to create awareness among all nationalists and strongly oppose such anti-national decisions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment