Delhi Terrorist Blast: Implications and Concerns | How Long India can avoid Isl@mization | Terrorism has Religion - which you know.
On November 10, 2025, a day preceding the Bihar Assembly elections, an explosion at Delhi's iconic Red Fort sent shockwaves across the nation. This unprecedented act of terrorism was the first in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's eleven-year tenure and struck at a site emblematic of India's sovereignty—the location where the national flag is hoisted annually on Independence Day. The attack resulted in the deaths of thirteen individuals and left over twenty critically injured.
Historically, terrorism in India had been largely confined to regions such as Kashmir, making this occurrence in the national capital an alarming escalation. Prompt investigations by security agencies unveiled disturbing revelations.
A matter of urgent concern is the potential deceleration of the investigation following the BJP alliance’s overwhelming victory in Bihar. Police had intercepted over three quintals of explosives just before the blast—quantities sufficient to inflict mass casualties exceeding one million. The instigators’ objective was reportedly a large-scale massacre targeting the Hindu population. The pressing question remains: what provoked such animosity toward Hindus? It is imperative for every Indian citizen to contemplate the motives behind this abhorrent intent.
The most disturbing revelation is that many accused terrorists were medical professionals—doctors sworn to save lives. The chief suspect, Dr. Umar Mohammad from Pulwama, held an MD in Internal Medicine and was a medical college professor. His expertise in Vehicle-Borne Improvised Explosive Devices (VBIED) was exploited in executing the attack. Another prominent accused, Dr. Shaheen Sayed from Lucknow, operated the female recruitment wing of Jaish-e-Mohammed and was employed at Al-Falah Medical College. Weapons and financial links uncovered in her possession underscore the depth of the conspiracy. Additional apprehended doctors affiliated with Al-Falah Medical University include Dr. Umar Un Navi, Dr. Muzammil Ganai, and Dr. Adil Ahmed Rather. Dr. Ahmed Moinuddin Sayed of Hyderabad was arrested for synthesizing the lethal chemical “Ricin,” allegedly intended for mass Hindu extermination.
This network has been characterized by law enforcement as “white-collar terror,” facilitating terrorism through sophisticated financial, recruitment, armament, and organizational apparatus tied to Jaish-e-Mohammed and Ansar Ghazwat-ul-Hind.
Ethical Quagmire in Medicine
The medical profession's cardinal duty is to preserve life, yet the subversion of this vocation by individuals camouflaging terrorism within medical uniforms amounts to not only a profound ethical crisis but also threatens the credibility of healthcare institutions.
This betrayal of trust propagates societal distrust. Hesitancy among Hindus to consult Muslim doctors cannot be simplistically dismissed as prejudice; it reflects a defensive vigilance born of palpable security concerns. Such social fissures evoke deeply rooted anxieties demanding collective introspection.
Historical Legacy and Contemporary Threats
India's encounter with Islamic invasions since the 7th century inflicted traumatic cultural ruptures, including the massacre of over 100 million Hindus and destruction of temples, replaced by mosques. The vestiges of such atrocities endure, exacerbated by legislative impediments such as the Places of Worship Act, which effectively obstruct Hindu recourse to justice. Neither the previous Congress-led government nor the incumbent BJP administration has remedied these historical injustices.
The doctrine of Ghazwa-e-Hind, aimed at rendering India an Islamic state, remains active within radical Isl@mist circles, regrettably enjoying varying degrees of tacit or overt support among large M@slim demographics. Demographic growth, religious conversions, and illegal immigration are orchestrated components advancing this agenda, shielded by the political machinations of Isl@mist entities.
It is an open secret that while some Indian M@slims oppose extremism and terror, no prominent voice decisively condemns Ghazwa-e-Hind, a silence fraught with implications.
Political Analysis
While the Modi government has enacted landmark policies such as abrogation of Article 370 and the Ram Temple construction, it has fallen short of vital reforms required for Hindu Temple autonomy, Hindu education, and cultural renaissance.
The continuance of state control over Hindu temples, the diversion of offerings for non-Hindu uses, and the unresolved restoration of religious sites seized by invaders remain pressing issues.
Globally, nations that secured independence vigorously restored their cultural and religious heritage; India, however, saw obstruction from Congress post-independence and reluctance from BJP thereafter. Yet, Hindus largely continue to support BJP, constrained by an apprehension that alternative administrations may accelerate the realization of an Isl@mic India by 2047. Modi’s vision of a developed India by 2047 risks ensnaring Hindus in illusions of progress while undermining their identity and security—a predicament that could precipitate a national crisis.
Conclusion
The Red Fort blast and similar incidents transcend mere security matters; they represent grave social and cultural warnings. India's development must not be confined to economic metrics but must equally encompass cultural preservation and national identity.
A society that forfeits its identity and safeguards imperils the very essence of the nation’s existence.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment