Ganga-Jamuni Culture, Brotherhood, and the Noise of Peace

 

---

Ganga-Jamuni Culture, Brotherhood, and the Noise of Peace || How Prepared Are You to Live in an Islamic Nation? || The Global Impact of Political Islam

---

For years, I have been warning through my writings about the growing threat of Islamization in India under the conspiracies of Ghazwa-e-Hind. Documents recovered in Phulwari Sharif, Bihar revealed that the Popular Front of India (PFI) was working on a plan to turn India into an Islamic nation by 2047. I did not expect this danger to surface so quickly and in such a massive form. The recent bombing near Delhi’s Red Fort exposed the involvement of jihadist doctors linked to Al-Falah University near Faridabad. This university was being used to prepare “white-collar terror modules.” The involvement of female doctors is also a major concern. Two such women, educated in Bangladesh and allegedly connected to terrorist organizations in Turkey and other Islamic countries, have been arrested.

The facts emerging from the Delhi blast are deeply worrying and shocking. It was a suicide bombing carried out by Dr. Umar Nabi, a specialist doctor and professor at Al-Falah University, who turned himself into a human bomb. Until now, security agencies believed suicide bombings were unlikely in India, since Indian Islam and Indian Muslims were considered distinct from others worldwide. Suicide bombing is an ISIS strategy, waging war against humanity in many countries. To kill “infidels” or damage a nation by becoming a human bomb is the extreme peak of Islamic radicalism. Once such a situation arises in a country, it becomes very difficult to control. Its beginning in India is a matter of grave concern.

The long-celebrated talk of Ganga-Jamuni Tehzeeb, brotherhood, and peace is, in reality, a deception — a shield to hide conspiratorial efforts of Islamization. Several people linked to the university were members of white-collar terror modules, systematically planning terrorist activities. The arrested doctors were working under Pakistan-backed handlers. The university was used as a safe haven. A fraud of ₹415 crore was also uncovered, where university funds were misused to build terror modules. These modules were found to have links with Kashmir as well.

Amid raids and arrests in the Valley, the political face of Islam also came forward. Mehbooba Mufti said the blast was the result of a “pressure-cooker atmosphere” created in the country, blaming central government policies. She claimed Kashmir’s troubles had spoken out at the Red Fort, pointing to rising Islamophobia and persecution of Muslims nationwide. Such statements appear to indirectly support terrorist activities. Her daughter, Iltija Mufti, expressed concern over Dr. Umar Nabi’s suicide bombing, linking the incident to Islamophobia and questioning security forces. Omar Abdullah, former J&K Chief Minister, said some individuals were responsible for the blast, but the perception was being created that all Kashmiris were guilty. His father, Farooq Abdullah, added that terrorists involved in the Red Fort attack did not represent Kashmiris, urging protection for innocent Kashmiris across India.

Such direct and indirect statements spread the narrative of victimhood and oppression, which is the hallmark of political Islam. Globally, this strategy has been executed with great success, and it has now become Islam’s expertise.

There is no doubt that attempts are being made to turn India into an Islamic nation as quickly as possible, with support from most Muslim groups. Ghazwa-e-Hind is presented as a religious war, aiming to transform India into Dar-ul-Islam (an Islamic nation). Institutions like Darul Uloom Deoband appear to legitimize this idea. Networks like white-collar terror modules, where highly educated individuals are involved in terrorism, highlight the seriousness of this conspiracy.

Mahmood Madani’s campaign to train one crore Muslim youth in physical defense and weapons by 2030 is equally suspicious. Since 2019, nearly 70 lakh youth have already been trained. This resembles the earlier camps run by PFI. Such training cannot be dismissed as innocent, and its role in preparing for civil war under Ghazwa-e-Hind cannot be ignored.

Efforts to Islamize India began with invasions in the 7th century, but India’s vast geography, linguistic diversity, and cultural richness prevented success. Yet, the same conditions that led to India’s partition are being recreated today. Many political parties, driven by vote-bank politics, indulge in Muslim appeasement, directly or indirectly supporting Islamization. Terrorist incidents, conversions, illegal infiltration, population explosion, communal riots, and land grabs through Waqf Boards all appear to serve one purpose — fulfilling the agenda of Ghazwa-e-Hind.

The Constitution itself contains provisions that indirectly support this transformation. Articles 25–26 grant minorities religious freedom and autonomy to run institutions, while Hindus remain disadvantaged. Muslim Personal Law Boards push Sharia practices, madrasas sow seeds of radicalism, and Waqf Boards continue land acquisition. Articles 29–30 give minorities special rights to preserve cultural identity and establish educational institutions, under which madrasas flourish, fostering separatist mindsets. The majority community feels deprived of such privileges.

India has more Muslim religious organizations than anywhere else in the world, many working toward Islamization. Wahhabi and Salafi groups, restricted abroad, operate freely in India. In some countries, mosques open only during prayer times, but in India they remain open continuously, spreading religious fervor. Friday sermons abroad are regulated, requiring certification, while madrasas are banned in many places — yet flourish here unchecked.

Thus, under the guise of minority rights and cultural identity, radical activities in India have become uncontrolled. The result is that the threat of Islamization has grown sharper. If urgent and appropriate steps are not taken, India may face suicide bombings and civil war. The road ahead will only become more difficult.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Delhi Terrorist Blast: Implications and Concerns

 

---

Delhi Terrorist Blast: Implications and Concerns | How Long India can avoid Isl@mization | Terrorism has Religion - which you know.

---

On November 10, 2025, a day preceding the Bihar Assembly elections, an explosion at Delhi's iconic Red Fort sent shockwaves across the nation. This unprecedented act of terrorism was the first in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's eleven-year tenure and struck at a site emblematic of India's sovereignty—the location where the national flag is hoisted annually on Independence Day. The attack resulted in the deaths of thirteen individuals and left over twenty critically injured.

Historically, terrorism in India had been largely confined to regions such as Kashmir, making this occurrence in the national capital an alarming escalation. Prompt investigations by security agencies unveiled disturbing revelations.

A matter of urgent concern is the potential deceleration of the investigation following the BJP alliance’s overwhelming victory in Bihar. Police had intercepted over three quintals of explosives just before the blast—quantities sufficient to inflict mass casualties exceeding one million. The instigators’ objective was reportedly a large-scale massacre targeting the Hindu population. The pressing question remains: what provoked such animosity toward Hindus? It is imperative for every Indian citizen to contemplate the motives behind this abhorrent intent.

The most disturbing revelation is that many accused terrorists were medical professionals—doctors sworn to save lives. The chief suspect, Dr. Umar Mohammad from Pulwama, held an MD in Internal Medicine and was a medical college professor. His expertise in Vehicle-Borne Improvised Explosive Devices (VBIED) was exploited in executing the attack. Another prominent accused, Dr. Shaheen Sayed from Lucknow, operated the female recruitment wing of Jaish-e-Mohammed and was employed at Al-Falah Medical College. Weapons and financial links uncovered in her possession underscore the depth of the conspiracy. Additional apprehended doctors affiliated with Al-Falah Medical University include Dr. Umar Un Navi, Dr. Muzammil Ganai, and Dr. Adil Ahmed Rather. Dr. Ahmed Moinuddin Sayed of Hyderabad was arrested for synthesizing the lethal chemical “Ricin,” allegedly intended for mass Hindu extermination.

This network has been characterized by law enforcement as “white-collar terror,” facilitating terrorism through sophisticated financial, recruitment, armament, and organizational apparatus tied to Jaish-e-Mohammed and Ansar Ghazwat-ul-Hind.

Ethical Quagmire in Medicine

The medical profession's cardinal duty is to preserve life, yet the subversion of this vocation by individuals camouflaging terrorism within medical uniforms amounts to not only a profound ethical crisis but also threatens the credibility of healthcare institutions.

This betrayal of trust propagates societal distrust. Hesitancy among Hindus to consult Muslim doctors cannot be simplistically dismissed as prejudice; it reflects a defensive vigilance born of palpable security concerns. Such social fissures evoke deeply rooted anxieties demanding collective introspection.

Historical Legacy and Contemporary Threats

India's encounter with Islamic invasions since the 7th century inflicted traumatic cultural ruptures, including the massacre of over 100 million Hindus and destruction of temples, replaced by mosques. The vestiges of such atrocities endure, exacerbated by legislative impediments such as the Places of Worship Act, which effectively obstruct Hindu recourse to justice. Neither the previous Congress-led government nor the incumbent BJP administration has remedied these historical injustices.

The doctrine of Ghazwa-e-Hind, aimed at rendering India an Islamic state, remains active within radical Isl@mist circles, regrettably enjoying varying degrees of tacit or overt support among large M@slim demographics. Demographic growth, religious conversions, and illegal immigration are orchestrated components advancing this agenda, shielded by the political machinations of Isl@mist entities.

It is an open secret that while some Indian M@slims oppose extremism and terror, no prominent voice decisively condemns Ghazwa-e-Hind, a silence fraught with implications.

Political Analysis

While the Modi government has enacted landmark policies such as abrogation of Article 370 and the Ram Temple construction, it has fallen short of vital reforms required for Hindu Temple autonomy, Hindu education, and cultural renaissance.

The continuance of state control over Hindu temples, the diversion of offerings for non-Hindu uses, and the unresolved restoration of religious sites seized by invaders remain pressing issues.

Globally, nations that secured independence vigorously restored their cultural and religious heritage; India, however, saw obstruction from Congress post-independence and reluctance from BJP thereafter. Yet, Hindus largely continue to support BJP, constrained by an apprehension that alternative administrations may accelerate the realization of an Isl@mic India by 2047. Modi’s vision of a developed India by 2047 risks ensnaring Hindus in illusions of progress while undermining their identity and security—a predicament that could precipitate a national crisis.

Conclusion

The Red Fort blast and similar incidents transcend mere security matters; they represent grave social and cultural warnings. India's development must not be confined to economic metrics but must equally encompass cultural preservation and national identity.

A society that forfeits its identity and safeguards imperils the very essence of the nation’s existence.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

“Hydrogen Bomb” and Congress’s Difficult Road 

By Shiv Mishra

In recent months, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has continuously launched a barrage of accusations against the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). He has described his revelations as “political bombs”—sometimes calling them “atom bombs,” at other times “hydrogen bombs.” Yet these statements appear less beneficial to Congress and more self-destructive.

Unconcerned about the consequences, Gandhi has been doing things unbecoming of a national-level leader, especially one holding the position of Leader of the Opposition. Ignoring important national occasions, he frequently travels abroad without clear reason, and there he criticizes India unnecessarily in ways that run counter to national interest. This has already cast serious doubt on his role. Other Congress leaders warn that India could face situations similar to Nepal, Bangladesh, or Sri Lanka. Gandhi himself, in his rallies, often delivers inflammatory speeches that deepen caste and communal divisions and incite the youth. Recently, he targeted the judiciary, claiming that “10 percent of upper-caste elites” control it.

Meanwhile, questions linger about his alleged British citizenship, his marital status, and corruption cases such as the Associated Journals property dispute. He has already been sentenced to two years in a defamation case, and several other matters remain pending in courts across the country. It is natural for the nation to wonder whether his connections extend to anti-India organizations or foreign powers.

Allegations on the Haryana Assembly Elections

Just 24 hours before the Bihar Assembly elections, Gandhi leveled serious charges regarding the 2024 Haryana Assembly polls. He claimed that nearly 2.5 million fake votes had been cast, turning Congress’s victory into BJP’s win. He also raised grave doubts about the impartiality of the Election Commission.

However, the actual figures tell another story. BJP received 5.55 million votes (39.94%), while Congress secured 5.43 million (39.09%). The difference was only 118,000 votes, giving BJP 48 seats and Congress 37. This arithmetic is not unusual. Sometimes a party wins a few seats by huge margins, which raises its overall vote share but does not translate into more seats. Conversely, if votes are evenly distributed across constituencies, a party can win more seats even with a narrow margin. That is what happened in Haryana, where BJP managed to win more seats despite the small difference in votes.

India’s electoral system is based on first-past-the-post, where the candidate with the highest votes in each constituency wins. Victory depends on seats, not overall vote percentage.

The Complexity of Seat Arithmetic

In Haryana’s 2024 elections, Congress won Firozpur Jhirka by 98,441 votes, while Punhana and Loharu were won by margins of only 700–800 votes. Out of 90 seats, 31 were decided by margins of less than 1,000 votes—12 for BJP, 10 for Congress, and 9 for other parties. This shows how election results often hinge on very small differences, making Gandhi’s sweeping claims difficult to accept.

Rajiv Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi

In 1984, Congress won 414 seats with 49.1% of the vote—a record in Indian politics. In 1989, its vote share fell to 40.62% and seats to 197. Meanwhile, BJP rose from 2 seats in 1984 to 88 in 1989, with only a modest increase in vote share to 11.87% from 7.74%. This demonstrates that seat counts depend not only on vote percentage but also on regional distribution. Even Rajiv Gandhi expressed disbelief at how a mere 4% increase in BJP’s vote share could yield such a surge in seats.

The “Brazilian Model” Controversy

Rahul Gandhi alleged that a Brazilian model had voted under multiple identities at 22 polling stations. His team even circulated photographs. The model herself released a video denying the claim. Verification showed that the voter ID cards carried the original photographs of Indian women, not the model’s. Several women came forward publicly with their IDs to prove the truth.

It appears Gandhi’s team may have deliberately inserted the model’s photo to sensationalize the issue. This incident severely damaged Congress’s credibility.

The Election Commission and government should form a special investigation team to probe this fraud. If it is proven that Gandhi’s team engaged in deception, strict action must follow to preserve the dignity of Indian democracy and its institutions.

House Numbers and Voter Lists

Gandhi also claimed that hundreds of voters were registered under a single house number. But in many Indian towns, traditional structures like “ Hata or Ahatas” contain dozens of homes and hundreds of residents. Thus, multiple voters under one house number is not unusual.

As for houses listed with “zero” numbers, many small villages still lack assigned building numbers. In databases, if the house number field is mandatory, “0” is often entered as a placeholder. This is a technical necessity, not fraud.

Congress’s Challenges and Direction

The Congress Party has historically played a central role in Indian politics. Yet after 11 years out of power at the center, it is now in deep introspection. Rahul Gandhi, despite holding various positions and being the face of the opposition, has not succeeded in energizing the organization. Congress’s presence is now limited to a few states. In Odisha and Punjab, the party has lost ground, while in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar its presence is negligible.

Nationally, Congress’s role has also diminished. If it relies solely on regional parties to gain power, it risks losing its independent identity and falling prey to instability and ideological imbalance, as seen during UPA-II. Today, Congress’s biggest challenge is not BJP but regional parties that have divided its traditional vote base.

Unless Congress rethinks its ideology and alliance strategy, and adopts an inclusive nationwide vision beyond sectarian appeasement or vote-bank politics, it risks being reduced to a minority-interest party.

Conclusion

Rahul Gandhi’s “hydrogen bomb” statements are not benefiting Congress; instead, they are weakening it. As investigations reveal facts, Congress’s credibility suffers further. Repeatedly casting doubt on the dignity of Indian democracy undermines public trust.

Politics cannot run on sensational accusations. The people seek solid facts and reliability. In this climate, Rahul Gandhi himself is proving to be a self-destructive bomb for his own party.

~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

 

Why Supreme Court slams UP Conversion Law || Is India's Supreme Court Communal?

 

---

Supreme Court slams UP Conversion Law || Is India's Supreme Court Communal? || Why is there such a contradiction between the decisions of the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court, who is right and who is wrong? ||

---

The Supreme Court's anti-Hindu stance has once again come to the fore. While the Supreme Court's anti-Hindu stance is not new, it is reaffirmed from time to time when its decisions are extremely suicidal for the country. Surprisingly, these decisions also serve to cover up and indirectly aid the conspiracies of the Left-Islamic alliance, which is constantly striving against Hindus and to transform India into an Islamic nation.

The Supreme Court recently commented on and quashed several cases registered under Uttar Pradesh's anti-conversion law, the "Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021." Specifically, the court quashed five cases registered in Fatehpur district, which were registered for Christian conversions. Although the Prayagraj High Court had considered the matter extensively and upheld the lawful police action, the Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra stated in its 158-page judgment that there was no substantial evidence or legal basis in these cases, and thus, the prosecutions were a "travesty of justice." The court stated that criminal law cannot be a means of harassing innocent citizens. The bench also initially raised several questions about the constitutionality of the law, stating that its procedures violate individual privacy, liberty, and the constitutional spirit of secularism. While the court did not declare the entire law unconstitutional, it stated that excessive government control and conditions imposed on citizens seeking religious conversion were a worrying aspect of the law. With this observation, the Supreme Court justified the process of forced conversion through deception and coercion. Why is there such a contradiction between the views of the High Court and the Supreme Court? Both cannot be right; one must be wrong. The Supreme Court petition was merely seeking the cancellation of FIRs, but the judges respectfully obliged the petitioners with gifts which served as a lesson to those who dared to take action against them.

The Uttar Pradesh government enacted the Prevention of Religious Conversion Act in 2021. It provides that anyone wishing to convert their religion in Uttar Pradesh must submit a declaration to a magistrate 60 days in advance, stating that they are doing so without any coercion. The person conducting the conversion must also inform the magistrate 30 days in advance. The magistrate then orders a police investigation. Once the conversion is complete, the person must again inform the magistrate within 60 days, providing identifying information. This information is then posted on a notice board. The person then has to appear before the magistrate within 21 days to confirm their identity and credentials. In July 2024, the Uttar Pradesh government passed the "Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2024," which further tightened the provisions of the law. These amendments provided for punishment of up to life imprisonment for forced or fraudulent conversion. Anyone can file an FIR in cases of conversion, whereas previously only the victim or their family could file a complaint. Any attempt to convert someone by offering inducements or concealing identity would be considered a cognizable offense and non-bailable. In such cases, action will be taken under Sections 298 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which carry a punishment of up to 10 years.

The case, related to the alleged mass conversion at the Evangelical Church of India in Fatehpur, was filed by a member of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, naming 35 named and 20 unidentified individuals as accused. In another case, an FIR was filed against Rajendra Bihari Lal, Vice Chancellor of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture and Technology (formerly Allahabad Agricultural Institute,) in Naini, Prayagraj, and other officials on charges of forced mass conversions to Christianity. Every student at the university and nearly everyone in Prayagraj can tell that Lal has been involved in conversions for decades.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court cited the case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, which stated that secularism is an integral part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The Court stated that the Preamble of the Constitution guarantees an individual the freedom to choose their religion, thought, faith, and belief. Furthermore, in its comments, the bench cited cases such as K.S. Puttaswamy and Shafin Jahan, which emphasized privacy and personal liberty as paramount. The Supreme Court stated that while it was not deciding the validity of the law, the conversion law initially impacts individual freedom and privacy.

Everyone should remember that India is secular only as long as Hindus are in the majority. Wherever Hindus are becoming a minority, or are being made so systematically,Communalism is gaining ground there. Gradually, the number of Hindus in seven states has declined to 2.5% in Lakshadweep, 2.7% in Mizoram, 8.7% in Nagaland, 11.5% in Meghalaya, 28% in Jammu and Kashmir, 29% in Arunachal Pradesh, and 38% in Punjab. Technically, although the Hindu population in Kerala is over 50%, which includes atheists and leftists who naturally oppose Hindus and are not Hindus by practice & life style. If these are excluded, Hindus constitute approximately 30%.

Very few people know that approximately 100 million Hindus were massacred in India by cruel, violent, and demonic Islamic invaders, subjecting them to horrific torture, which is the largest genocide on earth. Yet, even after this, they could not convert India into an Islamic nation. Now, through Ghazwa-e-Hind, the Muslim population is being increased as compared to Hindus to transform India into a Darul Islam, or Islamic nation. Love Jihad, religious conversions, and illegal infiltration are being used as weapons by islamic fundamentalists. The cooperation and support of the judiciary, administration, and so called intellectuals is being sought for this. Currently, there is a competition between Christian and Islamic fundamentalists to achieve maximum conversions. This is directly or indirectly supported by the judiciary and politicians.

There is no doubt that the anti-national and anti-Hindu nature of the Supreme Court is due to the collegium's selection process of judges, in which most judges are primarily selected from an anti-Hindu background who are closely aligned with Islamic-leftist ideology. Therefore, it is impossible for their decisions to be free from any anti-Hindu and anti-Sanatan sentiments. Although the Supreme Court's responsibility is to protect the Constitution, but the country is far greater than the Constitution. Therefore, the country comes first, than the Constitution. If the country itself is not survive, how can the Constitution will survive?

World history bears witness that in every country where the leftist Islamic alliance became dominant and wherever the policy of Muslim appeasement was adopted, those countries became Islamic. If Supreme Court judges continue to patronize fundamentalists in the name of secularism, the situation in India could rapidly deteriorate. Nowhere in the world are secularism and individual freedom given more importance than national unity and integrity, and cultural preservation.

The Supreme Court of India has completely failed in its role as the guardian of the Constitution. The original Constitution did not include the words secularism and socialism in the Preamble. The Waqf Board, Minority Commission, Places of Worship Act, reservation, Temple Acquisition Act, etc., were not the part of original constitution but were added later. The Places of Worship Act of 1991 is a constitutional fraud, implemented retrospectively from August 15, 1947, and its effect dates back to the seventh century, when the Islamic invaders began their invasions. Rebuilding Hindu religious sites and temples destroyed by invaders was impossible not only during Muslim rule, but also during the subsequent 200-year rule by the British. After independence, the Congress government created so many obstacles that the Somnath Temple could barely be rebuilt, while all other religious sites remained in ruins. The Places of Worship Act of 1991 halted all future efforts to preserve and revive India's cultural and religious heritage, but the Supreme Court remained silent because this anti-Hindu law was essentially designed to appease Muslims, and this also appeals to the Supreme Court. Therefore, it did not even entertain any petition to review this law.

In the context of the Supreme Court's harsh comments on the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law, there will be calls for its repeal, and all political parties involved in appeasement will support it in the name of protecting minority rights. Naturally, this will lead to communal polarization and directly support the conversion mafia, boosting their morale, leading to a rapid increase in conversions. In the long run, this trend of conversions will impact the rural population, especially in rural and tribal areas. This will ultimately lead to India's conversion to a Islamic Country.

Since the Modi government appears helpless and powerless before the Supreme Court, it is the duty of every patriot to create awareness among all nationalists and strongly oppose such anti-national decisions.

~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Anti-national activities begin in Ladakh

 

---

Anti-national activities begin in Ladakh || Sonam Wangchuk is a pawn, Congress and the deep state army are behind him || The journey of the left-Islamic alliance - Hamas via Qatar-Nepal-India and China via Nepal-Congress-India.

---

The peaceful region of Ladakh suddenly erupted into violence, with four protesters killed and many injured. The protesters' stated demands are: statehood for Ladakh, constitutional protection under the Sixth Schedule, separate Lok Sabha seats for Kargil and Leh, and reservation of government jobs for locals. However, these demands are not final. Negotiations on these demands were scheduled for October 6, 2025, with a high-level committee meeting planned for September 25. Ladakh was previously part of the state of Jammu and Kashmir. After the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh were made separate Union Territories. Jammu and Kashmir has a legislative assembly, while Ladakh does not. According to the protesters, the government had promised statehood after normalcy returned. So, what exactly happened that caused the protesters to resort to violence just a day before the negotiations were to begin? There is no simple answer, but someone feared that if the negotiations were successful, the movement would end, so violence was deliberately instigated. A bandh (strike) was called after two elderly men on a hunger strike were hospitalized. Security vehicles were set on fire in Leh, and the BJP office was vandalized. The Ladakh Autonomous Regional Administration office was also vandalized, and police were pelted with stones. The atmosphere had been deliberately heated up for some time. Similar statements have been made after regime changes in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Nepal, suggesting that something similar would happen in India. However, this has not happened in India, and it cannot happen because of the unique political structure and the strong position of the military and paramilitary forces. Some people even call this a sign of the maturity of Indian democracy.

The Indian opposition, including the Congress party, is very excited about the fall of the government in Nepal following the recent Gen-Z protests. Rahul Gandhi is convinced that his luck will change this way and he will become Prime Minister without even contesting an election. To hide the continuous failures of the Congress party due to public rejection, Rahul started accusing the Modi government of vote rigging, inspired by events in Bangladesh and guided by the deep state. In Bangladesh, after the elections were questioned, Sheikh Hasina had to flee for her life, and the country's leadership was handed over to the US puppet, Mohammad Yunus, who wasn't even living in the country. In Nepal, the ban on social media and corruption became major issues, but foreign powers and foreign funding played a significant role in the entire movement.

India is a very large country where such a power grab is not possible. Therefore, a different strategy was devised for India. First, pressure was exerted on two of Modi's allies, Chandrababu Naidu and Nitish Kumar, to withdraw their support from the BJP. When that failed, attempts were made to create a rift within the BJP and groom ambitious leaders for the Prime Minister's post. Efforts were also made to create distance between the BJP and the RSS so that Modi could be ousted from power, even if the BJP remained in government. But the "Modi Must Go" (MMG) mission failed. Therefore, the strategy shifted to creating unrest in different parts of the country to make the Modi government unpopular, so that Modi could be ousted if mid-term elections were held. A conspiracy to spread false and fabricated news against efficient and popular ministers of the Modi government, such as Amit Shah, Nitin Gadkari, and Ashwini Vaishnav, to force them to resign and weaken Modi, has also been hatched. Now the plan is to escalate this agitation to its peak by January 26th next year. So, if Ladakh becomes another Manipur, no one should be surprised.

The violent protests in Ladakh have a significant role played by the Congress party, China, the left-wing-Islamic alliance, and the deep state, all of whom are trying to destabilize India. While the violence was raging in Ladakh, similar chaotic protests were taking place in several states, including Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, Jharkhand, and West Bengal, under the banner of "I Love Muhammad." Recently, Rahul Gandhi met Zakir Naik and Alexander Soros, the son of George Soros, on a small island in Malaysia. There seems to be a connection between these events, and the government should investigate them thoroughly.

1.To understand the violent protests in Ladakh, it is essential to understand Sonam Wangchuk, who claims to be a social or environmental activist, but is actually a pawn of foreign powers.  
2.His father was a minister in the Abdullah and Mufti governments. 
3.He was portrayed as a hero in the film "3 Idiots," where he was displayed in the role of an "idiot, Amir Khan."  
4.He has received several international awards, including the Ramon Magsaysay Award. Everyone knows how and to whom the Ramon Magsaysay Award is given. Arvind Kejriwal also received the Ramon Magsaysay Award. After that, he launched a major protest movement against the then government. He wasn't able to seize power at the national level, but he succeeded in getting the government of the state of Delhi.  
Sonam Wangchuk also started a political movement after receiving this award.  
5.His organization, the Students' Educational and Cultural Movement of Ladakh, which he founded in 1988, received substantial funding from abroad, which was stopped after the Modi government came to power. Since then, Sonam Wangchuk has been vehemently criticizing the BJP.  
6.He is a friend of Muhammad Yunus and recently visited Pakistan.  
7.In the last 2-3 years, he has gone on hunger strikes several times and also walked from Ladakh to Delhi.  

His demands cannot be called undemocratic, but they are purely political and seem to align with the support of the National Conference, PDP, and Congress. For 72 years after independence, Ladakh was part of Jammu and Kashmir and remained neglected, but there was never a demand for a separate state or even greater autonomy. This region also suffered from neglect in terms of development and employment, but now that it has been made a Union Territory, separate from Jammu and Kashmir, the central government has initiated many development schemes. Financial assistance is also many times higher than before. Earlier, Ladakh had only two districts: Leh and Kargil. To accelerate development, the central government created five more districts—Drass, Zanskar, Nubra, Shamar, and Changthang—raising the total to seven. The central government is paying more attention to this region than ever before since independence. While the demand for full statehood for this region with a population of 3 lakh may not be justifiable, and it is certainly not beneficial compared to being a Union Territory. The rationale behind demanding a separate Lok Sabha seat for the predominantly Muslim Kargil region is understandable.

Sonam Wangchuk had been on a 35-day hunger strike since September 10, along with some members of the Ladakh Apex Body, demanding certain rights. On September 23, two elderly members of the group were hospitalized due to health issues. This was used as an excuse to mobilize people through social media on September 24. In his speech, Sonam Wangchuk incited the crowd, asking, "If what happened in Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh can happen there, why can't it happen in India?" He had previously addressed the crowd, citing the Arab Spring as an example. His aim was clearly to provoke the students, whom he referred to as "Gen Z."

No peaceful, democratic movement can justify inciting violence by citing the Arab Spring and the violence in neighboring countries. The assembled crowd set fire to the Election Commission office and the BJP office, damaged several government vehicles, and vandalized public property. Everything was done exactly as in Nepal. What was surprising was the arrest of six Nepali citizens from the scene. They confessed to their role in the violence and arson, stating they had been hired to carry it out. They also admitted to participating in similar violence and arson during the Gen Z protests in Nepal. All of them are active members of the Communist Party. Security agencies are interrogating them, but the involvement of a deep state, left-wing, Islamist nexus is clearly visible in the entire episode.

Qatar's role in the Nepal violence was also evident, as a large number of Nepali citizens work there, many of whom have ties to terrorist organizations like Hamas. Nepali citizens working in Qatar play a significant role in religious conversion activities in Nepal. They actively supported the recent violence in Nepal.

Sonam Wangchuk has been arrested under the National Security Act. The police and administration have taken more than 50 people into custody, and based on their interrogation, Sonam Wangchuk was arrested. The situation is fully under control, but the question remains: how could the police and administration have been unaware of the plan to incite unrest in Ladakh for so many days? This clearly indicates a major lapse on the part of the central security agencies. Based on his discussions with Sonam Wangchuk, Rahul Gandhi keeps repeating that a large part of Ladakh has been occupied by China. Speaking to the media, Sonam Wangchuk echoed almost the same points that Rahul Gandhi has been making. He hasn't denied his connection with the Congress party, as the source of these people one and the same, the "deep state."

The Modi government must learn from the farmers' movement and the Shaheen Bagh protests and not give any anti-national movement an opportunity to resort to violence by showing sympathy or taking a lenient view. This not only sends the wrong signals to the world but also emboldens anti-national elements. All patriots must be vigilant against anti-India conspiracies and raise awareness among others, so that no conspiracy to destabilize the nation can succeed.

~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~

The controversy surrounding the comments made about Lord Vishnu

 

---

Anti-Hindu CJI Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai || The controversy surrounding the comments made about Lord Vishnu || Is Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai religious, but not secular? || Is the Collegium system the root cause of corruption in the judiciary and detrimental to Hindu interests?

---

What is in the name? The recent comment by Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, mocking Hindu idol worship, has sparked outrage among Hindus. His name include Ram and Krishna, the two avatars of Lord Vishnu. The current case pertains to the Javari Temple in Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh, a UNESCO World Heritage site, maintained by the Archaeological Survey of India. The temple houses a seven-foot-tall, damaged statue of Lord Vishnu, missing both arms and its head. Petitioner Rakesh Dalal had filed a public interest litigation (PIL) demanding the restoration and reconstruction of the damaged statue, arguing that it was damaged during Mughal invasions and that the Archaeological Survey of India and the central government's negligence in its preservation violated the fundamental right to worship. A bench comprising Chief Justice Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih reprimanded the petitioner, stating, "Your petition is not a public interest litigation(PIL), but a publicity Interest Litigation Petition." Gavai told the petitioner, "If you are a devout devotee of Lord Vishnu, go and pray to him; only he can do something. This is an archaeological site; the Archaeological Survey of India has to give permission." He didn't stop there, adding, "Meanwhile, if you have no objection to Shaivism, you can worship the Shiva Linga; Khajuraho has the largest Shiva Linga."

Gawai's comments are astonishing because they do not seem to be those of a person of stature of Chief Justice, from any perspective. If it is not revealed who made these comments, they would appear to be the crude remarks of a vulgar, uneducated, and bigoted person. These are not ordinary comments, especially from a judge who is not Hindu. One expects a person of another religion not to insult another faith, but he did, and this is now part of the Supreme Court’s record. This has hurt the sentiments of the majority Hindu community, and they are very angry. A few days ago, the same bench, while hearing a petition related to a M@slim shrine (Dargah) under the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), had ordered the Central Government and the ASI to repair and maintain the shrine. This petition was no different, so why did Gawai make this comment?

No matter how much one thinks about these remarks, there is no satisfactory answer. The sole purpose of such comments is to insult Hinduism, which he did like a typical Ambedkarite. So why all the fuss? Hindus have given everyone this right because such comments about Hinduism are frequent, and the Hindu community never reacts strongly. Therefore, everyone has become fond of making such comments, whether politicians, bureaucrats, judges, or people of other religions. This is a very serious problem facing Hindus today. Gawai is not an ordinary person. He is a scholar, a lawyer, a judge of the High Court and Supreme Court, and now the Chief Justice of India. It is not unreasonable to expect from such a person to demonstrate a spirit of religious harmony in his words and actions, regardless of any bitterness or prejudice he may harbor.

If the Chief Justice had wanted to uphold his judicial duty, he could have simply ordered the government and the Archaeological Survey of India to consider the points of the petition, as this was not a dispute between two religions, and the same bench had issued an order on a similar petition a few days earlier. He could have dismissed the petition without any comment, and no one would have said anything. Therefore, these comments cannot be considered unintentional, and they sent a message of disdain to the Hindu community: "Don't come to the Supreme Court with religious grievances; pray to your deity and seek redress." But if that were to happen, Hindus would have to act according to religious texts, not the Constitution, and the constitutional framework, within which the Supreme Court's authority lies, would crumble.

If we examine Gavai's comment closely, it is a mockery of idol worship and the Hindu community, which is the declared ideology of Isl@mic extremists. Is this what secularism means? That if a case involving a church or mosque comes up, it will be heard and a decision rendered, but a Hindu religious site case will be dismissed with ridicule? Why is the Supreme Court hearing the Waqf Board case? Why wasn't the petitioner told to go to All@h? In the Krishna Janmabhoomi and Gyanvapi temple cases, the M@slim community could have been told to go to All@h. The disputed Jama Masjid in Sambhal, built after demolishing the Vishnu Hari temple, is also under the Archaeological Survey of India. Why didn't the Supreme Court tell the M@slim community to approach the ASI with their grievance, when even the ASI staff cannot enter it? Gavai made another, even more dangerous, comment that the media hasn't discussed. He told the petitioner that if there is no objection to Shaivism, they can worship the Shiva Linga; Khajuraho has the largest Shiva Linga. This doesn't mean Gavai doesn't know about Hinduism; rather, by saying this, he is mocking the Shaiva and Vaishnava sects of Sanatana Dharma. He wants to highlight the differences between these groups and divide Hindus in a new way, which is precisely what today's Ambedkarites, communist and Isl@mist are doing.

When Gavai was promoted to Chief Justice, the media discussed that he was India's second Dalit Chief Justice, which is true also, but Gavai didn't hesitate to react and stated that he was India's first Buddhist Chief Justice. According to Hinduism, Lord Buddha is considered as 9th incarnation of Vishnu, so Buddhism is considered a sect of Hinduism according to constitutional provisions. Can someone who disrespects Lord Vishnu so much be a Buddhist? Probably not, he cannot be a Buddhist at all, but he can be an Ambedkarite. Most of the 22 vows taken by Ambedkar were against Hinduism. Gavai is an Ambedkarite Buddhist who, after becoming Chief Justice, visited Lumbini, the birthplace of Lord Buddha, with his family and became the first Indian Chief Justice to visit the birthplace of Buddha. He described Nepal, the birthplace of Buddha, as 'the cradle of thinkers and reformers' who challenged existing norms, inspired moral thinking, and tried to improve society. Gavai must be aware that the Supreme Court building was set on fire during the recent Gen-Z movement in Nepal. This clearly shows that he is religious, but in my opinion, he is not secular.

Although Gavai said he is completely secular and that his comments were misrepresented on social media, but he did not express regret for what he said. If anti-Hindu sentiment is the benchmark for secularism in the judiciary, then he is definitively secular, and expecting tolerance or goodwill for Hinduism from such secularists is futile because their origin, the Collegium system, is such that only a certain type of person can become a judge. Therefore, since independence, no one has seen a Chief Justice who had any sense of goodwill or empathy towards Hinduism.

Even after being in power for 11 consecutive years, the Modi government has failed to bring about any change in the anti-Hindu character of the judiciary. It is no longer acceptable to say, "The government is Modi's, but the system is Congress's." Therefore, it is the responsibility of the entire Hindu community to openly oppose every anti-Hindu act of the judiciary, while maintaining respect for the institution. The collegium system must be strongly opposed until it is abolished, as it is the most effective stronghold of leftist and isl@mic extremist ideologies. The awakened Hindu society cannot be suppressed any further, but it is also essential that everyone be made aware of this reality.

~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra~~~~~~~~~~