Why Supreme Court slams UP Conversion Law || Is India's Supreme Court Communal?

 

---

Supreme Court slams UP Conversion Law || Is India's Supreme Court Communal? || Why is there such a contradiction between the decisions of the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court, who is right and who is wrong? ||

---

The Supreme Court's anti-Hindu stance has once again come to the fore. While the Supreme Court's anti-Hindu stance is not new, it is reaffirmed from time to time when its decisions are extremely suicidal for the country. Surprisingly, these decisions also serve to cover up and indirectly aid the conspiracies of the Left-Islamic alliance, which is constantly striving against Hindus and to transform India into an Islamic nation.

The Supreme Court recently commented on and quashed several cases registered under Uttar Pradesh's anti-conversion law, the "Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021." Specifically, the court quashed five cases registered in Fatehpur district, which were registered for Christian conversions. Although the Prayagraj High Court had considered the matter extensively and upheld the lawful police action, the Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra stated in its 158-page judgment that there was no substantial evidence or legal basis in these cases, and thus, the prosecutions were a "travesty of justice." The court stated that criminal law cannot be a means of harassing innocent citizens. The bench also initially raised several questions about the constitutionality of the law, stating that its procedures violate individual privacy, liberty, and the constitutional spirit of secularism. While the court did not declare the entire law unconstitutional, it stated that excessive government control and conditions imposed on citizens seeking religious conversion were a worrying aspect of the law. With this observation, the Supreme Court justified the process of forced conversion through deception and coercion. Why is there such a contradiction between the views of the High Court and the Supreme Court? Both cannot be right; one must be wrong. The Supreme Court petition was merely seeking the cancellation of FIRs, but the judges respectfully obliged the petitioners with gifts which served as a lesson to those who dared to take action against them.

The Uttar Pradesh government enacted the Prevention of Religious Conversion Act in 2021. It provides that anyone wishing to convert their religion in Uttar Pradesh must submit a declaration to a magistrate 60 days in advance, stating that they are doing so without any coercion. The person conducting the conversion must also inform the magistrate 30 days in advance. The magistrate then orders a police investigation. Once the conversion is complete, the person must again inform the magistrate within 60 days, providing identifying information. This information is then posted on a notice board. The person then has to appear before the magistrate within 21 days to confirm their identity and credentials. In July 2024, the Uttar Pradesh government passed the "Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion (Amendment) Bill, 2024," which further tightened the provisions of the law. These amendments provided for punishment of up to life imprisonment for forced or fraudulent conversion. Anyone can file an FIR in cases of conversion, whereas previously only the victim or their family could file a complaint. Any attempt to convert someone by offering inducements or concealing identity would be considered a cognizable offense and non-bailable. In such cases, action will be taken under Sections 298 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which carry a punishment of up to 10 years.

The case, related to the alleged mass conversion at the Evangelical Church of India in Fatehpur, was filed by a member of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, naming 35 named and 20 unidentified individuals as accused. In another case, an FIR was filed against Rajendra Bihari Lal, Vice Chancellor of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture and Technology (formerly Allahabad Agricultural Institute,) in Naini, Prayagraj, and other officials on charges of forced mass conversions to Christianity. Every student at the university and nearly everyone in Prayagraj can tell that Lal has been involved in conversions for decades.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court cited the case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, which stated that secularism is an integral part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The Court stated that the Preamble of the Constitution guarantees an individual the freedom to choose their religion, thought, faith, and belief. Furthermore, in its comments, the bench cited cases such as K.S. Puttaswamy and Shafin Jahan, which emphasized privacy and personal liberty as paramount. The Supreme Court stated that while it was not deciding the validity of the law, the conversion law initially impacts individual freedom and privacy.

Everyone should remember that India is secular only as long as Hindus are in the majority. Wherever Hindus are becoming a minority, or are being made so systematically,Communalism is gaining ground there. Gradually, the number of Hindus in seven states has declined to 2.5% in Lakshadweep, 2.7% in Mizoram, 8.7% in Nagaland, 11.5% in Meghalaya, 28% in Jammu and Kashmir, 29% in Arunachal Pradesh, and 38% in Punjab. Technically, although the Hindu population in Kerala is over 50%, which includes atheists and leftists who naturally oppose Hindus and are not Hindus by practice & life style. If these are excluded, Hindus constitute approximately 30%.

Very few people know that approximately 100 million Hindus were massacred in India by cruel, violent, and demonic Islamic invaders, subjecting them to horrific torture, which is the largest genocide on earth. Yet, even after this, they could not convert India into an Islamic nation. Now, through Ghazwa-e-Hind, the Muslim population is being increased as compared to Hindus to transform India into a Darul Islam, or Islamic nation. Love Jihad, religious conversions, and illegal infiltration are being used as weapons by islamic fundamentalists. The cooperation and support of the judiciary, administration, and so called intellectuals is being sought for this. Currently, there is a competition between Christian and Islamic fundamentalists to achieve maximum conversions. This is directly or indirectly supported by the judiciary and politicians.

There is no doubt that the anti-national and anti-Hindu nature of the Supreme Court is due to the collegium's selection process of judges, in which most judges are primarily selected from an anti-Hindu background who are closely aligned with Islamic-leftist ideology. Therefore, it is impossible for their decisions to be free from any anti-Hindu and anti-Sanatan sentiments. Although the Supreme Court's responsibility is to protect the Constitution, but the country is far greater than the Constitution. Therefore, the country comes first, than the Constitution. If the country itself is not survive, how can the Constitution will survive?

World history bears witness that in every country where the leftist Islamic alliance became dominant and wherever the policy of Muslim appeasement was adopted, those countries became Islamic. If Supreme Court judges continue to patronize fundamentalists in the name of secularism, the situation in India could rapidly deteriorate. Nowhere in the world are secularism and individual freedom given more importance than national unity and integrity, and cultural preservation.

The Supreme Court of India has completely failed in its role as the guardian of the Constitution. The original Constitution did not include the words secularism and socialism in the Preamble. The Waqf Board, Minority Commission, Places of Worship Act, reservation, Temple Acquisition Act, etc., were not the part of original constitution but were added later. The Places of Worship Act of 1991 is a constitutional fraud, implemented retrospectively from August 15, 1947, and its effect dates back to the seventh century, when the Islamic invaders began their invasions. Rebuilding Hindu religious sites and temples destroyed by invaders was impossible not only during Muslim rule, but also during the subsequent 200-year rule by the British. After independence, the Congress government created so many obstacles that the Somnath Temple could barely be rebuilt, while all other religious sites remained in ruins. The Places of Worship Act of 1991 halted all future efforts to preserve and revive India's cultural and religious heritage, but the Supreme Court remained silent because this anti-Hindu law was essentially designed to appease Muslims, and this also appeals to the Supreme Court. Therefore, it did not even entertain any petition to review this law.

In the context of the Supreme Court's harsh comments on the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law, there will be calls for its repeal, and all political parties involved in appeasement will support it in the name of protecting minority rights. Naturally, this will lead to communal polarization and directly support the conversion mafia, boosting their morale, leading to a rapid increase in conversions. In the long run, this trend of conversions will impact the rural population, especially in rural and tribal areas. This will ultimately lead to India's conversion to a Islamic Country.

Since the Modi government appears helpless and powerless before the Supreme Court, it is the duty of every patriot to create awareness among all nationalists and strongly oppose such anti-national decisions.

~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Anti-national activities begin in Ladakh

 

---

Anti-national activities begin in Ladakh || Sonam Wangchuk is a pawn, Congress and the deep state army are behind him || The journey of the left-Islamic alliance - Hamas via Qatar-Nepal-India and China via Nepal-Congress-India.

---

The peaceful region of Ladakh suddenly erupted into violence, with four protesters killed and many injured. The protesters' stated demands are: statehood for Ladakh, constitutional protection under the Sixth Schedule, separate Lok Sabha seats for Kargil and Leh, and reservation of government jobs for locals. However, these demands are not final. Negotiations on these demands were scheduled for October 6, 2025, with a high-level committee meeting planned for September 25. Ladakh was previously part of the state of Jammu and Kashmir. After the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh were made separate Union Territories. Jammu and Kashmir has a legislative assembly, while Ladakh does not. According to the protesters, the government had promised statehood after normalcy returned. So, what exactly happened that caused the protesters to resort to violence just a day before the negotiations were to begin? There is no simple answer, but someone feared that if the negotiations were successful, the movement would end, so violence was deliberately instigated. A bandh (strike) was called after two elderly men on a hunger strike were hospitalized. Security vehicles were set on fire in Leh, and the BJP office was vandalized. The Ladakh Autonomous Regional Administration office was also vandalized, and police were pelted with stones. The atmosphere had been deliberately heated up for some time. Similar statements have been made after regime changes in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Nepal, suggesting that something similar would happen in India. However, this has not happened in India, and it cannot happen because of the unique political structure and the strong position of the military and paramilitary forces. Some people even call this a sign of the maturity of Indian democracy.

The Indian opposition, including the Congress party, is very excited about the fall of the government in Nepal following the recent Gen-Z protests. Rahul Gandhi is convinced that his luck will change this way and he will become Prime Minister without even contesting an election. To hide the continuous failures of the Congress party due to public rejection, Rahul started accusing the Modi government of vote rigging, inspired by events in Bangladesh and guided by the deep state. In Bangladesh, after the elections were questioned, Sheikh Hasina had to flee for her life, and the country's leadership was handed over to the US puppet, Mohammad Yunus, who wasn't even living in the country. In Nepal, the ban on social media and corruption became major issues, but foreign powers and foreign funding played a significant role in the entire movement.

India is a very large country where such a power grab is not possible. Therefore, a different strategy was devised for India. First, pressure was exerted on two of Modi's allies, Chandrababu Naidu and Nitish Kumar, to withdraw their support from the BJP. When that failed, attempts were made to create a rift within the BJP and groom ambitious leaders for the Prime Minister's post. Efforts were also made to create distance between the BJP and the RSS so that Modi could be ousted from power, even if the BJP remained in government. But the "Modi Must Go" (MMG) mission failed. Therefore, the strategy shifted to creating unrest in different parts of the country to make the Modi government unpopular, so that Modi could be ousted if mid-term elections were held. A conspiracy to spread false and fabricated news against efficient and popular ministers of the Modi government, such as Amit Shah, Nitin Gadkari, and Ashwini Vaishnav, to force them to resign and weaken Modi, has also been hatched. Now the plan is to escalate this agitation to its peak by January 26th next year. So, if Ladakh becomes another Manipur, no one should be surprised.

The violent protests in Ladakh have a significant role played by the Congress party, China, the left-wing-Islamic alliance, and the deep state, all of whom are trying to destabilize India. While the violence was raging in Ladakh, similar chaotic protests were taking place in several states, including Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, Jharkhand, and West Bengal, under the banner of "I Love Muhammad." Recently, Rahul Gandhi met Zakir Naik and Alexander Soros, the son of George Soros, on a small island in Malaysia. There seems to be a connection between these events, and the government should investigate them thoroughly.

1.To understand the violent protests in Ladakh, it is essential to understand Sonam Wangchuk, who claims to be a social or environmental activist, but is actually a pawn of foreign powers.  
2.His father was a minister in the Abdullah and Mufti governments. 
3.He was portrayed as a hero in the film "3 Idiots," where he was displayed in the role of an "idiot, Amir Khan."  
4.He has received several international awards, including the Ramon Magsaysay Award. Everyone knows how and to whom the Ramon Magsaysay Award is given. Arvind Kejriwal also received the Ramon Magsaysay Award. After that, he launched a major protest movement against the then government. He wasn't able to seize power at the national level, but he succeeded in getting the government of the state of Delhi.  
Sonam Wangchuk also started a political movement after receiving this award.  
5.His organization, the Students' Educational and Cultural Movement of Ladakh, which he founded in 1988, received substantial funding from abroad, which was stopped after the Modi government came to power. Since then, Sonam Wangchuk has been vehemently criticizing the BJP.  
6.He is a friend of Muhammad Yunus and recently visited Pakistan.  
7.In the last 2-3 years, he has gone on hunger strikes several times and also walked from Ladakh to Delhi.  

His demands cannot be called undemocratic, but they are purely political and seem to align with the support of the National Conference, PDP, and Congress. For 72 years after independence, Ladakh was part of Jammu and Kashmir and remained neglected, but there was never a demand for a separate state or even greater autonomy. This region also suffered from neglect in terms of development and employment, but now that it has been made a Union Territory, separate from Jammu and Kashmir, the central government has initiated many development schemes. Financial assistance is also many times higher than before. Earlier, Ladakh had only two districts: Leh and Kargil. To accelerate development, the central government created five more districts—Drass, Zanskar, Nubra, Shamar, and Changthang—raising the total to seven. The central government is paying more attention to this region than ever before since independence. While the demand for full statehood for this region with a population of 3 lakh may not be justifiable, and it is certainly not beneficial compared to being a Union Territory. The rationale behind demanding a separate Lok Sabha seat for the predominantly Muslim Kargil region is understandable.

Sonam Wangchuk had been on a 35-day hunger strike since September 10, along with some members of the Ladakh Apex Body, demanding certain rights. On September 23, two elderly members of the group were hospitalized due to health issues. This was used as an excuse to mobilize people through social media on September 24. In his speech, Sonam Wangchuk incited the crowd, asking, "If what happened in Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh can happen there, why can't it happen in India?" He had previously addressed the crowd, citing the Arab Spring as an example. His aim was clearly to provoke the students, whom he referred to as "Gen Z."

No peaceful, democratic movement can justify inciting violence by citing the Arab Spring and the violence in neighboring countries. The assembled crowd set fire to the Election Commission office and the BJP office, damaged several government vehicles, and vandalized public property. Everything was done exactly as in Nepal. What was surprising was the arrest of six Nepali citizens from the scene. They confessed to their role in the violence and arson, stating they had been hired to carry it out. They also admitted to participating in similar violence and arson during the Gen Z protests in Nepal. All of them are active members of the Communist Party. Security agencies are interrogating them, but the involvement of a deep state, left-wing, Islamist nexus is clearly visible in the entire episode.

Qatar's role in the Nepal violence was also evident, as a large number of Nepali citizens work there, many of whom have ties to terrorist organizations like Hamas. Nepali citizens working in Qatar play a significant role in religious conversion activities in Nepal. They actively supported the recent violence in Nepal.

Sonam Wangchuk has been arrested under the National Security Act. The police and administration have taken more than 50 people into custody, and based on their interrogation, Sonam Wangchuk was arrested. The situation is fully under control, but the question remains: how could the police and administration have been unaware of the plan to incite unrest in Ladakh for so many days? This clearly indicates a major lapse on the part of the central security agencies. Based on his discussions with Sonam Wangchuk, Rahul Gandhi keeps repeating that a large part of Ladakh has been occupied by China. Speaking to the media, Sonam Wangchuk echoed almost the same points that Rahul Gandhi has been making. He hasn't denied his connection with the Congress party, as the source of these people one and the same, the "deep state."

The Modi government must learn from the farmers' movement and the Shaheen Bagh protests and not give any anti-national movement an opportunity to resort to violence by showing sympathy or taking a lenient view. This not only sends the wrong signals to the world but also emboldens anti-national elements. All patriots must be vigilant against anti-India conspiracies and raise awareness among others, so that no conspiracy to destabilize the nation can succeed.

~~~~~~Shiv Mishra ~~~~~~

The controversy surrounding the comments made about Lord Vishnu

 

---

Anti-Hindu CJI Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai || The controversy surrounding the comments made about Lord Vishnu || Is Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai religious, but not secular? || Is the Collegium system the root cause of corruption in the judiciary and detrimental to Hindu interests?

---

What is in the name? The recent comment by Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, mocking Hindu idol worship, has sparked outrage among Hindus. His name include Ram and Krishna, the two avatars of Lord Vishnu. The current case pertains to the Javari Temple in Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh, a UNESCO World Heritage site, maintained by the Archaeological Survey of India. The temple houses a seven-foot-tall, damaged statue of Lord Vishnu, missing both arms and its head. Petitioner Rakesh Dalal had filed a public interest litigation (PIL) demanding the restoration and reconstruction of the damaged statue, arguing that it was damaged during Mughal invasions and that the Archaeological Survey of India and the central government's negligence in its preservation violated the fundamental right to worship. A bench comprising Chief Justice Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih reprimanded the petitioner, stating, "Your petition is not a public interest litigation(PIL), but a publicity Interest Litigation Petition." Gavai told the petitioner, "If you are a devout devotee of Lord Vishnu, go and pray to him; only he can do something. This is an archaeological site; the Archaeological Survey of India has to give permission." He didn't stop there, adding, "Meanwhile, if you have no objection to Shaivism, you can worship the Shiva Linga; Khajuraho has the largest Shiva Linga."

Gawai's comments are astonishing because they do not seem to be those of a person of stature of Chief Justice, from any perspective. If it is not revealed who made these comments, they would appear to be the crude remarks of a vulgar, uneducated, and bigoted person. These are not ordinary comments, especially from a judge who is not Hindu. One expects a person of another religion not to insult another faith, but he did, and this is now part of the Supreme Court’s record. This has hurt the sentiments of the majority Hindu community, and they are very angry. A few days ago, the same bench, while hearing a petition related to a M@slim shrine (Dargah) under the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), had ordered the Central Government and the ASI to repair and maintain the shrine. This petition was no different, so why did Gawai make this comment?

No matter how much one thinks about these remarks, there is no satisfactory answer. The sole purpose of such comments is to insult Hinduism, which he did like a typical Ambedkarite. So why all the fuss? Hindus have given everyone this right because such comments about Hinduism are frequent, and the Hindu community never reacts strongly. Therefore, everyone has become fond of making such comments, whether politicians, bureaucrats, judges, or people of other religions. This is a very serious problem facing Hindus today. Gawai is not an ordinary person. He is a scholar, a lawyer, a judge of the High Court and Supreme Court, and now the Chief Justice of India. It is not unreasonable to expect from such a person to demonstrate a spirit of religious harmony in his words and actions, regardless of any bitterness or prejudice he may harbor.

If the Chief Justice had wanted to uphold his judicial duty, he could have simply ordered the government and the Archaeological Survey of India to consider the points of the petition, as this was not a dispute between two religions, and the same bench had issued an order on a similar petition a few days earlier. He could have dismissed the petition without any comment, and no one would have said anything. Therefore, these comments cannot be considered unintentional, and they sent a message of disdain to the Hindu community: "Don't come to the Supreme Court with religious grievances; pray to your deity and seek redress." But if that were to happen, Hindus would have to act according to religious texts, not the Constitution, and the constitutional framework, within which the Supreme Court's authority lies, would crumble.

If we examine Gavai's comment closely, it is a mockery of idol worship and the Hindu community, which is the declared ideology of Isl@mic extremists. Is this what secularism means? That if a case involving a church or mosque comes up, it will be heard and a decision rendered, but a Hindu religious site case will be dismissed with ridicule? Why is the Supreme Court hearing the Waqf Board case? Why wasn't the petitioner told to go to All@h? In the Krishna Janmabhoomi and Gyanvapi temple cases, the M@slim community could have been told to go to All@h. The disputed Jama Masjid in Sambhal, built after demolishing the Vishnu Hari temple, is also under the Archaeological Survey of India. Why didn't the Supreme Court tell the M@slim community to approach the ASI with their grievance, when even the ASI staff cannot enter it? Gavai made another, even more dangerous, comment that the media hasn't discussed. He told the petitioner that if there is no objection to Shaivism, they can worship the Shiva Linga; Khajuraho has the largest Shiva Linga. This doesn't mean Gavai doesn't know about Hinduism; rather, by saying this, he is mocking the Shaiva and Vaishnava sects of Sanatana Dharma. He wants to highlight the differences between these groups and divide Hindus in a new way, which is precisely what today's Ambedkarites, communist and Isl@mist are doing.

When Gavai was promoted to Chief Justice, the media discussed that he was India's second Dalit Chief Justice, which is true also, but Gavai didn't hesitate to react and stated that he was India's first Buddhist Chief Justice. According to Hinduism, Lord Buddha is considered as 9th incarnation of Vishnu, so Buddhism is considered a sect of Hinduism according to constitutional provisions. Can someone who disrespects Lord Vishnu so much be a Buddhist? Probably not, he cannot be a Buddhist at all, but he can be an Ambedkarite. Most of the 22 vows taken by Ambedkar were against Hinduism. Gavai is an Ambedkarite Buddhist who, after becoming Chief Justice, visited Lumbini, the birthplace of Lord Buddha, with his family and became the first Indian Chief Justice to visit the birthplace of Buddha. He described Nepal, the birthplace of Buddha, as 'the cradle of thinkers and reformers' who challenged existing norms, inspired moral thinking, and tried to improve society. Gavai must be aware that the Supreme Court building was set on fire during the recent Gen-Z movement in Nepal. This clearly shows that he is religious, but in my opinion, he is not secular.

Although Gavai said he is completely secular and that his comments were misrepresented on social media, but he did not express regret for what he said. If anti-Hindu sentiment is the benchmark for secularism in the judiciary, then he is definitively secular, and expecting tolerance or goodwill for Hinduism from such secularists is futile because their origin, the Collegium system, is such that only a certain type of person can become a judge. Therefore, since independence, no one has seen a Chief Justice who had any sense of goodwill or empathy towards Hinduism.

Even after being in power for 11 consecutive years, the Modi government has failed to bring about any change in the anti-Hindu character of the judiciary. It is no longer acceptable to say, "The government is Modi's, but the system is Congress's." Therefore, it is the responsibility of the entire Hindu community to openly oppose every anti-Hindu act of the judiciary, while maintaining respect for the institution. The collegium system must be strongly opposed until it is abolished, as it is the most effective stronghold of leftist and isl@mic extremist ideologies. The awakened Hindu society cannot be suppressed any further, but it is also essential that everyone be made aware of this reality.

~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra~~~~~~~~~~

After Nepal, is it India's turn?

 

---

After Nepal, is it India's turn? || Before Nepal, an attempt was made in India but due to Modi's vigilance, Trump backed off || Rahul Gandhi, Alexander Soros and Zakir Naik made new plans in Malaysia

---

The situation in Nepal is now almost clear and the campaign for change of power which was started in the form of "Gen-G" movement has reached its destination. Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli has resigned and fled. A former Prime Minister was barely saved by the army but his wife was burnt alive. Many ministers were violently assaulted and many government buildings including the Supreme Court were set on fire. When the violent riotous mob attacked the Pashupatinath temple and started vandalism, the army had to take charge. Former Chief Justice Sushila Karki has become the interim Prime Minister who will conduct elections to form a new government as soon as possible. It may take 6 months to 1 year to complete the election process, till then there will be an atmosphere of instability in Nepal. For the first time in this movement, the name of Gen-G came up which means people whose age is less than 30 years, that means, most of the agitators are students, but it would not be right to call it a student movement because some invisible foreign power was handling the reins of the entire movement. Gradually, anarchist elements also joined it. It has been reported that terrorist organizations Hizbul, ISIS and ISI have also joined because those who attacked Pashupatinath temple can neither be Hindus nor atheists.

This amazing looking revolution of Nepal forced the Prime Minister to resign in just 2 days. India should not be even a bit sad about the fall of the leftist government of absconding Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli because he was working for China and ignoring the interests of Nepal. A large part of Nepal was occupied by China but by making a new map, he was showing a large part of India as Nepal's. Due to corruption, nepotism and ruin of the country, there was a lot of anger against him among the people. The irony was that the government of Nepal was being run by the ruling party and the main opposition together. Therefore, there was rampant corruption and this was a big issue, but apart from corruption, the ban on social media was also a big reason for the entire movement. Therefore, it is obvious, that multinational American social media platforms and foreign powers are behind this movement.

Some time ago, such a violent movement took place in Bangladesh and Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had to flee to save her life and take refuge in India. As an interim government, American puppet Mohammad Yunus, who unfortunately is also a Nobel Peace Prize winner, was appointed as the Prime Minister, but even after such a long time, the situation of holding elections has not become clear. He patronized Hindu genocide and is working directly under American instructions. Before that, such violent movement had also taken place in Sri Lanka and there too, was a widespread violence against the politicians and public in general. The President had to flee to save his life. In the widespread violence, government buildings, official residences of President and Prime Minister were set on fire and were looted. A horrific dance of anarchy was witnessed which became the reason for the change of power. In Pakistan, the elected government remains in power for a very short time because the army seizes power whenever it wants. Therefore, the removal of Imran Khan was not discussed much in the media. As soon as he started speaking against America, a movement was started against him by making the issue of election rigging and corruption. Then the regime was changed and now he is in jail. At present, a similar movement is being run in Indonesia and it would not surprising if in near future, a change in regime is seen there too.

It is only a coincidence that all these countries are neighboring countries of India, after the incidents there, an attempt is made to create an atmosphere in India that now this will happen in India too and the Modi government will be overthrown. Congress has been waiting for this for a long time and is also making special efforts for this but it is not getting success in this task. It is not that such efforts are not being made in India. In fact, such efforts started only after the Modi government came to power because the Modi had curbed the work of international organizations which were openly playing in India. The shops of the beneficiaries working at the behest of the deep state and foreign powers have been shut. These include journalists, bureaucrats, judges, social media influencer, politicians and representatives of NGOs. The return of the Modi government with a huge majority in 2019 has given sleepless nights to the deep state and the Congress. All of them do not want to tolerate the Modi government anymore under any circumstances. Therefore, American agencies intensified their operations in India through some organizations. In the name of strengthening democracy, making voters aware etc., a huge amount of money was spent to create a narrative against the government, so that it could be removed from power and if needed, a big mass movement could be created on the wave of public anger and the government could be forced to leave power, as happened in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh and now the same script has been repeated in Nepal.

To overthrow the Modi government, a protest against CAA was organised at Shaheen Bagh, Delhi for 6 months.   Unfortunately, the Supreme Court too, instead of giving a decision against this movement, appointed its negotiators for a settlement, which made the situation even more complicated. At the end,  riots were organised in Delhi. The government was not affected but the movement died a natural death. 
An attempt was made to create a new discourse for change of regime in India in the form of the Farmers Protest. The so called agitating farmers sat on the borders of Delhi for more than a year, causing a national loss of billions of rupees, but whether it is called the maturity or weakness of the government, it did not use force against the agitators. The matter also reached the Supreme Court, but the judicial system of India was never untouched by the influence of the deep state. Although the agricultural laws made by the government were extremely useful for bringing revolutionary changes in the agricultural sector of India, but due to the non-cooperation of the judiciary and the stubbornness of the alleged farmers, the government withdrew the agricultural laws. The so called agitators and conspirators were not mentally prepared for this sudden step taken by the government, so they were not ready to end the agitation even after the withdrawal of the agricultural law and an attempt was made to agitate again for the constitutional guarantee of minimum support price. On the occasion of Republic Day, a ruckus was created by these so called farmers in the capital. The tricolor was insulted and an attempt was also made to scorch the social fabric of India by removing the tricolor from the Red Fort and hoisting the flag of a particular religion. A section of the media worked to add fuel to this fire. A lot of efforts were made to bring people on the streets on the occasion of Republic Day and to force the government to leave power, but this did not happen. 
For the 2024 general elections, international conspirators, Isl@mic extremists and leftists, along with the opposition, especially the Congress, tried their best to defeat Modi in the elections and they were partially successful  as Modi missed getting a majority on his own but succeeded in forming the government with the help of Naidu and Nitish. The campaign of international conspirators in these elections could have been successful if the opposition had even a little credibility among the people, especially the Congress, which the people have removed from their hearts and minds for its anti-national activities. This is the reason why the Congress under the leadership of Rahul Gandhi is dreaming of capturing the power of India by colluding with anti India foreign powers and with the help of the Isl@mic-Leftist alliance. 

By the way, this is not a big deal for the Gandhi family. From Nehru to Rahul Gandhi, everyone has been involved in this work. No one's attachment towards the country is visible. Everyone has a feeling of extreme hatred towards the Sanatan culture and Hindu Dharma. They love not the land of India, but its throne. That is why they never bother for the national interest while being in power. There is a long list of anti-national and anti-Hindu activities of Congress led by Nehru, Indira, Rajiv and Sonia Gandhi. Even if the Prime Minister of the Congress is not from the Gandhi family, their puppet too cannot be different. It is difficult to easily estimate how much damage a learned person like PV Narasimha Rao has done to the country and Sanatan Dharma by making several laws like places of worship, Wakf Board, Minority Commission etc. Manmohan Singh had no identity as Prime Minister, everything was done by Sonia's advisors. Now, the frustrated Rahul wants to do something on the instructions of foreign bosses, which his family and Congress have never done.

Rahul Gandhi is therefore, working simultaneously on two fronts, first he wants to destroy Hindu society and Hindu Dharma and second he wants to capture power. He can either get power by destroying Hindu society and Hindu Dharma or destroy Hindu society and Hindu Dharma after getting power, but his final goal is to make India an Isl@mic nation, which M@slims also desire. Therefore both are complementary to each other.

After Operation Sindoor, a big conspiracy was hatched amidst the deteriorating relations between America and India in which pressure was put on Modi supporters both Nitish and Naidu to withdraw support from Govt. For this, Congress used Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar along with an industrialist as pawns but Modi and Amit Shah got wind of the matter due to which the American ploy became futile and Rahul Gandhi's dream was shattered once again.

Caste census, questioning the Election Commission and making the election process suspicious is the agenda of the deep state, which Rahul Gandhi is repeating by raising the slogan "Vote Chor Gaddi Chhod" ( Vote Thief, Leave the throne). Many times the deep state has tried to create a movement through Rahul Gandhi but the circumstances of India are different, from neighbouring countries, there is no anger against the government among the public, the public has not forgotten the corruption and anti-national activities of Congress and no one believes in the leadership capabilities of Rahul Gandhi. Therefore, the agenda of international conspirators and Congress to overthrow the government will never be fulfilled. Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are very small countries in comparison to India which is a very big country with the fourth largest economy in the world.

Fortunately, India has a politically skilled and mature political leadership in the form of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The police, paramilitary forces and the army have their own unique structure and positioning. Therefore, there appears no possibility of a coup in India like in the neighboring countries. Still, to ensure that no one can ignite a fire, strict control and constant monitoring of political, social and communal inflammable materials kept in the country is extremely necessary. The entire nation needs to be vigilant.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Shiv Mishra~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rahul's atom bomb turned out to be Chinese, it has failed, it has no power

 

---

Rahul's atom bomb turned out to be Chinese, it has failed, it has no power || Congress's face is blackened once again but there is no fear of public shame, so it doesn't matter to Rahul

---

Rahul Gandhi had said long ago that he would drop an atom bomb on the Election Commission, which was being eagerly awaited in the political circles. Keeping in mind the dates of dropping of atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, on 6 and 9 August 1945, he dropped his atom bomb on Delhi on 7 August 2025, but it fizzled out, not even a Diwali bomb came out. It produced a lot of smoke, which once again blackened the face of the Congress.

In a press presentation, Rahul Gandhi accused the Election Commission of stealing votes for the BJP and said that he has caught the theft, the evidence of which he wants to give to the entire country including the Election Commission through a press conference. If the Election Commission has even a little honesty and transparency, then they should answer all the points raised by me to the people of the country. Taking cognizance of Rahul Gandhi's press conference, the Election Commission has requested him to file an affidavit that whatever he has said is fact based and is absolutely correct according to his knowledge and belief and that he knows that legal action can be taken against him for giving misleading and false information. The Election Commission has also sent a format in this regard to Rahul Gandhi, which he has to sign and send back. There is absolutely no possibility of Rahul Gandhi giving any information to the Election Commission on the affidavit because lying is his nature. He lies with great confidence and keeps on speaking until his lies are completely exposed. Even after this, he does not stop and starts with a new lie. This work of his, has been going on for the last several years, for which he has also been punished. The Supreme Court has also made harsh comments, but he is not afraid of public shame.

The most pleasant and surprising aspect of Rahul Gandhi's press presentation was that he did not raise doubts on EVMs, he only blamed the Election Commission for fake voters and voting lists. He alleged that there were one lakh fake voters in Mahadev Pura assembly constituency of Bengaluru Central parliamentary constituency of Karnataka. According to him, due to this reason, BJP won this parliamentary seat in 2024, but Congress won the five assembly seats coming under it in 2023. Rahul very cleverly hid the fact that BJP has been winning this seat continuously for the last five times. Rahul Gandhi blamed vote theft for his defeat in Haryana and Maharashtra, but in the areas where he alleged vote theft, Congress won most of the seats, then if there was vote theft, then who did it? Who benefited.

Rahul Gandhi, while naming a voter from Lucknow, said that apart from Lucknow, he is also registered as a voter in Mumbai and Bengaluru, but did not tell which state's voter list of which year he has used. At present, Lok Sabha and Assembly elections are held at different times. Assembly elections of different states are also held at different times. In such a situation, people who leave their jobs at one place and go to another place and if elections are held there after some time, they get registered. Such problems are very common due to transfers. I myself have faced such problems during my transfers within and out of state. This person from Lucknow would definitely be a voter in Lucknow, when he went to Mumbai for a job, he became a voter there and then when he went to Bengaluru from there to work, he became a voter there. It is possible that he may have voted in the Assembly elections or Lok Sabha elections of these states held at different times and it is also possible that he may not have voted anywhere, but as of today there is no law that prohibits voting in this manner. Very conveniently, Rahul Gandhi did not tell that from which period the voter lists of the states from which the names have been taken are from and how did he find out about this example. The main reason for such errors is the absence of a centralized voter list. If Lok Sabha and Assembly elections are held together, then such problems will be automatically resolved. In this way, Rahul Gandhi has also supported BJP's plan of "One Nation One Election".

Rahul Gandhi told five ways of vote- theft in the press presentation, first is duplicate voter, second is illegal address, third many voters are registered at the same address, fourth is illegal photo or very small photo which is difficult to identify, and fifth is Form-6 used for registration of new voters. The five points highlighted by Rahul Gandhi are not the result of any invention or deep investigation. These are most common errors which are known to everyone including the Election Commission. In no way can this be a deliberate attempt to win the election. Amendment in the voter list is required to correct these, so that the names of all such people can be removed from the voter list who do not live at that address, have died, have shifted, the address is illegal, the photo is wrong or other details are not available. As far as Form 6 is concerned, it is for new voter registration. Rahul said that in Karnataka a 70-year-old woman has been registered as a new voter. This cannot be wrong. If someone's EPIC transfer is getting delayed due to change of place and elections are near, then the old registration can be cancelled by application, simultaneously registration can be done on form 6. There is a provision for cancellation. But it may also happen that this new aged voter is a Bangladeshi or Rohingya infiltrator and in this case, it is necessary to remove his name.

The gist of Rahul's presentation is that to remove all such errors, a thorough revision of the voter list is required, and the same work is being done in Bihar, which Rahul Gandhi and his alliance parties are opposing. This presentation emphasized the need for a thorough revision of the voter list and if Rahul has even a little seriousness in bringing transparency in the election process, then he should strongly support the voter list revision process being done in Bihar, but it is also absolutely necessary that this work should be transparent. Rahul Gandhi has burst an atom bomb and has strongly opposed the process of voter list revision in Bihar, even stalled the Parliament, blunted its edge.

Rahul Gandhi said that the Election Commission is not giving him the digital data and CCTV footage of the voters even after repeated requests, this shows that there is something fishy. The Election Commission steals votes for BJP, if it is not so then they should prove it. Even after so much evidence, if the Election Commission does not provide electronic data and CCTV footage, it will be proved that Election Commission is a part of the crime of vote theft. He warned that when our government is formed, all the officers of Election Commission, big and small, will have to face the consequences. This statement of Rahul Gandhi confirms that he is the real heir of the long ruling autocratic family, whose arrogance is reflected in his aggressive behavior.

Election Commission has asked Rahul to give an affidavit or apologize to the country, which is absolutely right, but Rahul, who has become the Indian version of Donald Trump, not only repeated his allegations in the “Vote Rights Rally” in Bengaluru, but also made objectionable comments on Election Commission, so now the time has come to rein in such anarchic elements who have crossed the limits of shamelessness and are tarnishing the dignity of the country, and have become puppets in the hands of foreign powers. The commission should initiate strict legal action; the Supreme Court should also take suo-moto cognizance of anti-constitutional acts so that constitutional institutions can be prevented from being made a joke. All patriots should strongly oppose such anti-national elements.

~~~~Shiv Mishra~~~~