Waqf Board in the Supreme Court of India || Gandhi - Nehru’s Muslim appeasement divided India || Helping Waqf Board, is helping Ghazwa-e-hind by Rahul-Congress
The Supreme Court has reserved its decision on this after hearing for three days on the petitions seeking a stay on the Waqf Board Amendment Act 2025. Due to keen interest in the case, a large number of people listened carefully to the arguments presented by the advocates of the Central Government and the respondents. People wondered how the previous governments made this law through which the Waqf Board can occupy any land in India. According to the current provisions, the aggrieved persons and institutions cannot even knock on the door of the court. Most people are of the opinion that there should be no place for such a law in a secular nation like India. If the complaints of the victims and public sentiments are considered as a yardstick, then the significance of the new law being made by the government is proved.
Many state governments are themselves donating properties to the Waqf Board. The Congress government at the Center had given more than 100 very valuable properties of Delhi to the Waqf Board just before the elections in 2013. The affidavit filed by the Central Government in the Supreme Court has revealed a very worrying and shocking fact that after 2013, there has been an increase of 20.92 lakh acres in Waqf land. According to the government, a total of 18.29 lakh acres of Waqf property was created before the Mughal period, before independence and after independence. According to the data that was in front of the country till now, the Waqf Board has about 8.7 lakh properties, which constitute 9.4 lakh acres of land, whose estimated value is about Rs 1.2 lakh crores. Till now the Waqf Board is said to be the third largest land owner after the Army and Railways, but according to the new data given by the Central Government, the Waqf Board has 38.29 lakh acres of land of 8.72 lakh properties, in which the area of 2.17 lakh properties of Sunni Central Waqf Board of Uttar Pradesh is not included due to non-availability, which if included, the Waqf Board will have around 50 lakh acres of land. Today, the Waqf Board has become the largest landowner not only in India but in the world. By cultivating the crop of Muslim votes on the appeasement, the Congress and other political parties have always supported the occupation campaign of the Waqf Board directly and indirectly, due to which the situation has become so dire today.
The changes that have been made in the new law of the Waqf Board include, the inclusion of non-Muslim members and women, digitization of Waqf properties, the right of survey to the Collector, mandatory registration of properties to be Waqf and permission to appeal in the High Court against the decision of the tribunal, but the biggest change is the name of the Waqf Board, which has now been changed to the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 2025 i.e. UWMEED or Umeed (Hope) Act 2025. The opposition is more upset than the Muslims about the new law of the Waqf Board. It is attacking the government by accusing it of interference in the religious matters of Muslims. Opposition parties and many Muslim organizations reached the Supreme Court against the amended Waqf Act and demanded its repeal. The Supreme Court started hearing the petitions as quickly as they were filed. Interim orders were also passed on the points on which the petitioners had sought relief, which included not making any appointments in the Waqf Board and Central Waqf Council as per the new law, not declaring the properties acquired by the Waqf Board through Waqf by User and Waqf by Deed as government properties and not changing their ownership, not getting the disputed Waqf properties investigated by the District Magistrate and not making any changes in the structure of the Waqf Board and Central Waqf Council.
The Supreme Court has the right to examine the constitutionality of any law, but there can be no bigger irony than it immediately passing an interim order to maintain the status quo on a law passed by the Parliament of the world's largest democracy without any hearing or thorough investigation. That too on a law for which a joint parliamentary committee was formed, who visited several states, met and talked to various Muslim organizations, representatives of Wakf Board, state governments and people harassed by Wakf Board. After long discussions, the committee finalized the report and the amended bill was passed only after serious discussions in both the houses of the Parliament. The Vice President had pointed out some time back that the Supreme Court is acting like a Shaktiman (Omnipotent), beyond its jurisdiction. Recently, a bench of two judges of the Supreme Court, while giving a decision on the petition of the Tamil Nadu government, had limited the powers of the Governor and the President, which is completely against the constitutional system. The President appoints the judges of the High Court and the Supreme Court, and he / she also administers the oath to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is now trying to become supreme not only in the judiciary, but also in parliamentary democracy, which is a big threat to democracy itself.
There are about 4.5 crore cases pending in India at present, which do not include cases of revenue, central and state taxes, and tribunals. Petitions of political, wealthy, and influential people and institutions with high reach are heard immediately. Ordinary people do not get justice easily. It is far beyond the reach of the government. Even matters of national interest are being ignored by the Judiciary who has neither any responsibility nor accountability. The Supreme Court is right in saying that the judiciary, legislature and executive are all equal and the constitution is supreme. The judiciary does not remember or does not know that the constitution is not bigger than the nation. The constitution is for the nation, not the nation for the constitution. India is an ancient nation but after partition two nations were formed, one India and the other Pakistan. On logical grounds, both the countries were new, then why did the Waqf Board had to resort to the laws of 1923 and 1934? All the Muslim invaders who came, lived somewhere on Indian land, settled somewhere, and did something or the other. Why are all such land properties with the Waqf Board today? This country was divided on the basis of the ideology of Muslim leaders that “Hindus and Muslims cannot live together” and accordingly all the Muslims of India had to go to Pakistan. If this had happened, what would have happened to the so-called Waqf properties of the Muslim invaders in India? Even after the partition, the Muslims who are in India today have no moral right on the pre-partition Waqf properties, especially the so-called Waqf properties of the Muslim invaders. Governments shamelessly making such laws and handing over these properties to the Waqf Board is tantamount to shattering the national pride and strangling our ancient Sanatan culture. It is in the greed for these properties that the Muslims of India brazenly call the Muslim invaders who massacred the Hindus as their ancestors.
Why did the judiciary, which calls the Constitution supreme, not remember its constitutional responsibility on Hindu temple acquisition, Waqf Board, places of worship laws? Why was it silent on the Hindu exodus from Kashmir and the Hindu massacre in West Bengal? How did the judiciary accept the supremacy of the Parliament when it overturned the decision of the Supreme Court by making a law in the Shah Bano case?
The judiciary is under question but convenience instead of the constitution, opportunism instead of nationalism has put the country in a big crisis, which all patriots have to face together
~~Shiv Mishra~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment